InfoSec Compliance & AI Governance For over 20 years, DISC InfoSec has been a trusted voice for cybersecurity professionals—sharing practical insights, compliance strategies, and AI governance guidance to help you stay informed, connected, and secure in a rapidly evolving landscape.
Researchers from Positive Security uncovered a website scanner called “Urlscan” that unintentionally leaking sensitive URLs and data due to misconfiguration.
It appears that a third party accidentally leaked the GitHub Pages URLs, and this incident happened while a metadata analysis was being conducted.
“This information could be used by spammers to collect email addresses and other personal information,” Bräunlein, Co Founder Positive security said. “It could be used by cyber criminals to take over accounts and run believable phishing campaigns.”
The URLscan.io service is described as a sandbox for the web and has been referred to as a web scanner. Several security solutions integrate with its API in order to make their solutions more secure and feature-rich.
The idea behind it is to allow users to identify possible malicious websites with ease and confidence using a simple, straightforward tool. A wide range of open-source projects and enterprise customers are supported by the engine.
Sensitive data can be mined
It was discovered that users who enabled Github Pages as a hosting method for a private repository leaked the name of the repository. There does not seem to have been any public official acknowledgment of this breach as of yet.
There is a possibility that an anonymous user could easily search for and retrieve a vast amount and variety of sensitive data within the API integration.
This is because the API is equipped with several varieties of security tools that run scans on incoming emails and conduct Urlscans on every link that is received.
Several types of information are provided with each scan result that is returned by the service, including:-
Password reset links
Unsubscribe links
Account creation URLs
API keys
Information about Telegram bots
DocuSign signing requests
Amazon gift delivery links
Shared Google Drive links
Dropbox file transfers
Invite links to SharePoint
Invite links to Discord
Government Zoom invites
PayPal invoices
Paypal money claim requests
Links to Cisco Webex meeting recordings
Package tracking links
It has been noted that some API integrations use generic Python requests that use the python-requests/2.X.Y module. This would lead to scans being mistakenly submitted as public if user agents ignored account visibility settings.
Some of the biggest barriers to cloud adoption are security concerns: data loss or leakage, and the associated legal and regulatory concerns with storing and processing data off-premises.
In the last 18 months, 79% of companies have experienced at least one cloud data breach; even more alarmingly, 43% have reported 10 or more breaches in that time. Despite the clear advantages of cloud infrastructure, one of the main challenges that often gets overlooked is the need to: (1) trust that the infrastructure will be secure enough against threats and (2) that the chosen cloud provider won’t purposefully or inadvertently access the data processing on their infrastructure. When dealing with highly sensitive/confidential data (such as banking information or healthcare patient data), this becomes a major concern and a barrier to further cloud adoption.
Traditional approaches for protecting data have relied upon implementing access controls and policies and encrypting data at rest and in transit, but none are able to prevent the threat in its entirety because a fundamental challenge remains: keeping data encrypted when in use, while it is being processed. Confidential computing – projected to be a $54B market by 2026 – is emerging as a way to remove the need for trusting infrastructure and service providers by keeping data protected/encrypted even when in use.
Confidential computing technology uses hardware-based techniques to create isolated environments called enclaves (also known as Trusted Execution Environments or TEEs).
Code and data within enclaves are inaccessible by other applications, users, or processes colocated on the system. The enclave keeps the data encrypted even when in use – while in memory and during computation. With a secure enclave environment, multiple parties can collaborate on analytics and AI use cases without compromising the confidentiality of their individual data and exposing it to other parties.
According to a recent survey, using secure enclaves in the enterprise setting is attractive for implementing safeguards for the following scenarios:
Protect against insider threats. Data in the cloud is accessible to the database administrators of the cloud applications or infrastructure via direct access to the database, application logs, and device memory
Prevent platform software (i.e., a platform hypervisor) from accessing data
Protect data from adjacent workloads in a multitenant/user environment
Protect the integrity of crowdsourced ML models
Confidential data sharing and multi-party collaboration
If these scenarios apply to you and your business, but you’re unsure what you’ll need to know to get started, here are five questions to ask your CISO:
1. Will I need to deploy specialized hardware to keep our data protected?
Confidential computing technology is now available on all major cloud providers. This obviates the need to procure and maintain specialized hardware yourselves. Even though confidential computing and secure enclaves are still in the “emerging technology bucket,” organizations can easily adopt confidential computing through cloud vendors and ISVs. The cloud providers see the benefit of secure enclaves and their future potential as a transformative technology, and so have bought in.
2. Will we need to rewrite applications to use secure enclaves?
Some confidential computing technologies, such as Intel SGX, require application modifications before they can run within enclaves. Other technologies, such as Confidential VMs, provide more flexibility and can run unmodified applications.
But, from a security perspective, this has the downside of having to trust the entire software stack within the VM. So, depending on the use case and requirements, one technology may be preferable over the other. In addition, proper adoption of confidential computing requires orchestrating management of the other constituent technologies, such as remote attestation.
The enclave adoption process can be complex and engineering teams will have to take time to build these capabilities to get their applications up and running. While bandwidth may be tight at times, the ROI is worth it in the long run. A growing ISV ecosystem can also help in the seamless adoption of confidential computing for a rich variety of use cases.
3. Can I use secure enclaves to improve data collaboration with other teams?
Before data can be shared with other teams, organizations typically need to follow a cumbersome governance process to restrict access to sensitive data, eliminate data sets or mask specific data fields, and prevent any level of data sharing.
Integrating secure enclaves provides an opportunity for organizations to increase both productivity and security measures. Multiple data owners can individually encrypt their entire data (including PII), pool it together, and analyze the collective data set within enclaves. Done effectively, multi-party collaboration can drive faster business results by enabling new and higher-quality insights.
4. Will I need to add additional security expertise to the team?
Implementing confidential computing workflows can be difficult to do directly without using existing tools and software. One needs to make sure that confidential data is protected throughout its lifecycle. This can have a variety of moving parts – from integrating with existing key management systems to managing secure enclave infrastructure, rewriting applications, deploying code securely and verifiably to the enclaves, and keeping confidential data encrypted in storage and in transit in/out of the enclaves. However, there is a rich emerging ISV ecosystem of software that alleviates the complexities of confidential computing for a rich variety of use cases, making it easy to use and adopt by non-experts.
5. Will I need to lock myself into a single cloud?
The top CPU vendors all introduced secure enclave and confidential computing solutions in recent years. These were adopted by the leading cloud vendors, some of which now offer solutions based on the same underlying technology. Microsoft Azure and Google Cloud Platform, for example, offer solutions based on AMD’s SEV technology. As software solutions running on top of these cloud platforms evolve, application vendors will introduce cross-platform solutions powered by the common hardware layers.
Conclusion
Businesses considering adopting cloud technology can better do so with secure enclaves. By asking your CISO these five questions, businesses can move into the future, understand what implementing secure enclaves will look like, better secure their data, and create a more efficient analytics process.
This ongoing shift to the cloud will increase efficiency for companies and reduce human error – especially knowing 57% of businesses will move their workloads to the cloud before the end of the year. When secure enclaves are implemented properly, the crucial component of ensuring security is not sacrificed. All businesses working with data should consider integrating confidential computing into their models to allow for analytics and AI on encrypted data.
Healthcare organizations are increasingly using apps for telehealth and beyond. These apps have a significant impact on how they operate. They also have access to lots of sensitive information, such as EMR.
As a result, we have seen an uptick in healthcare application threats globally. The top threat risks in healthcare industry includes ransomware, DDoS and automated attacks.
Healthcare data breaches are the costliest across the globe. They cost healthcare organizations USD 9.23 million on average. The figure is more than twice the pan-industry average of USD 4.24 million. Managing AppSec risks is crucial to healthcare organizations.
How to Reduce Risks of Healthcare Application Threats?
Ongoing Risk Assessments
This is the first, most critical step in risk management in healthcare. It lays the foundation for a robust AppSec program. Risk assessments help you identify, analyze and rank your apps’ risks.
Risk assessments involve the following:
Identifying app vulnerabilities
Evaluating the exploitability of each vulnerability
Identifying application threats
Analysing attack probability
Analysing the potential impact of application threats on mission-critical assets
Allocating resources based on the criticality of risks
Defining ways to keep risks within tolerance levels
This way, you can ensure your mission-critical assets are always available and secure.
Compliance frameworks like HIPAA mandate that these assessments be done once a year. But that isn’t enough. You need to keep assessing and managing risks regularly. Only then can you harden your app security posture.
Establish and Update Security Policies
Clearly defined app security policies are critical to averting application threat risks. These policies should incorporate security, industry, legal and regulatory best practices. The AppSec policies should define security strategies, processes, tools, and procedures. They should define the following:
Incident response and disaster recovery plans
Role-based, strict access controls
Zero trust authentication and password policies
Backup and storage
Data privacy and security policies
AppSec should define processes for users to report suspicious activities. AppSec policies should include proper communication plans too.
Further, you must regularly update these security policies. The policies should reflect the latest best practices and the latest risk posture.
Identify and Secure Threat Entry Points
How do application threats become successful attacks? Attackers keep looking for exploitable entry points. These entry points are vulnerabilities, misconfigurations, and security gaps. They exploit entry points that aren’t secure when they find them. They can then
Introduce malware
Create backdoors
Steal data
Make services unavailable to patients/ employees
So, you need to be proactive in finding and securing entry points. And do so before attackers find them. To this end, you must put in place a vulnerability management program.
Inventory all your healthcare app-related assets. This process should be automated. It should automatically identify all endpoints, APIs, components, third-party services, etc. Make sure to include all assets for crawling by your scanning and next-gen WAF tools.
Deploy an automated scanner to keep identifying known flaws. This way, you can prevent the inaccuracies and inefficiencies of manual scanning. Perform pen-testing and security audits regularly to identify
Unknown vulnerabilities
Logical flaws
Zero-day application threats
Understand the exploitability of flaws
Strength of security defenses
You can rank these flaws based on the level of risks involved. Then, you can remediate through permanent fixes or instant virtual patching. Leverage fully managed security solutions to manage your vulnerabilities better.
Centralized Visibility into Security Posture
You must have real-time visibility into your app security posture. This will help you take immediate action to prevent application threats.
Ensure Your Vendors Prioritize Security
You may use several third-party apps, APIs, and services. It is key that you carefully vet vendors before onboarding services. Why? Your apps will be at risk if they don’t take security seriously. Make sure they take steps to monitor and avert application threats.
You must also ensure vendors are compliant. To this end, you should keep monitoring and auditing them.
Keep Educating All Users
Human errors are top vulnerabilities enabling cyber attacks in healthcare. That is why continuous education of all users is a must. Users include patients/ customers, employees, and partners who use your apps.
All users must know the app security dos and don’ts. They should know what to click and what not to. They must be able to make smart decisions. They must know whom to report to or what action to take when observing unusual activities.
Invest in Reliable Security Solutions
Invest in reliable, fully managed security solutions like AppTrana. AppTrana includes comprehensive security solutions backed by industry expertise in managing your healthcare security risks.
The Way Forward Cyber-attacks on healthcare are becoming more lethal, complex, and severe. Take proactive action to minimize your application threat risk.
CISOs are working overtime and can’t always switch off from work, according to a recent Tessian report.
Recent headlines have shown that security stakes have never been higher, and it’s likely this high level of pressure that’s causing 18% of security leaders to work 25 extra hours a week. That’s double the amount of overtime that they worked in 2021. While many are hopping on the “quiet-quitting” trend, CISOs have the opposite problem.
In this Help Net Security video, Josh Yavor, CISO at Tessian, offers a personal perspective on dealing with burnout as a CISO.
A security flaw in the Galaxy Store allows attackers to trigger remote code execution on affected smartphones.
The now patched vulnerability, which affects Galaxy Store version 4.5.32.4, relates to a cross-site scripting (XSS) bug that occurs when handling certain deep links. An independent security researcher has been credited with reporting the issue.
Vulnerability Details
The now-patched vulnerability is related to a cross-site scripting (XSS) flaw that occurs when handling specific deep links and it affects Galaxy Store version 4.5.32.4. The problem was first reported by an independent security researcher.
Particularly, deeplink can be called from another application or from a browser. The store receives appropriate deeplinks, it will process and show them in a webview.
In this case, by failing to secure the deeplink, the attacker is able to run JS code in the Galaxy Store application’s webview context whenever a user hits a link from a website that contains the deeplink.
The expert focuses on deep links configured for Samsung’s Marketing & Content Service (MCS).
Although the Samsung MCS Direct Page website was extracting the argument from the url and displaying it on the website, it did not encrypt, which resulted in an XSS problem.
“We can see the website is processing the abc, def parameters and displaying as above without encoding, the url is passed directly to href this is very dangerous and will cause XSS.” reads the advisory published by SSD Secure Disclosure.
Experts observed two functions ‘downloadApp’ and ‘openApp’ here these two functions will get the app id and download them from the store or open them.
This indicates that these two functions can be called using JS code. In this case, an attacker has the ability to execute arbitrary code by injecting it into the MCS website.
“To be able to successfully exploit the victim’s server, it is necessary to have HTTPS and CORS bypass of Chrome,” advisory published by SSD Secure Disclosure
Affected Products and Patch Available
The vulnerability impacts Galaxy Store version 4.5.32.4.
Therefore, Samsung has issued patches that are now in wide circulation for all Samsung devices.
33N Ventures is fundraising €150 million for investing in cybersecurity and infrastructure software companies across Europe, Israel, and the US. The fund will mostly target investments at Series A and B, with an average ticket size of around €10 million, and has an investment capacity of €20 million already committed by Alantra and its strategic partners.
Co-founders and managing partners Carlos Alberto Silva and Carlos Moreira da Silva have made more than 20 investments in cybersecurity and infrastructure software over the past 10 years, across Europe, Israel and the US – including most notably Arctic Wolf.
In this Help Net Security interview, they discuss the cybersecurity investment landscape in Europe, the strategies for finding the right companies, and more.
Company founders usually think mainly about California and Tel Aviv when discussing infosec investments. What’s your impression of the current cybersecurity VC landscape in Europe?
Carlos Alberto Silva: There’s no doubt that the US and Israeli startup ecosystems get more attention when it comes to cybersecurity. But that’s not to say there haven’t been success stories in Europe. Take IriusRisk, for example: the automated threat modeling platform raised a $28.7M Series B round just a few weeks ago.
By rights, Europe should be a world leader in this space. Talent is abundant here, and there is a very large addressable market. The challenge for companies in Europe is that, unlike their peers in the US and Israel, they often don’t get the specialized support they need to compete.
While there are a few specialized funds in Europe, most focus naturally only on one country or region and tend to invest in very early-stage companies. As a result, most entrepreneurs face the choice of working with a US investor (that lacks on-the-ground local knowledge) or working with a generalist fund that may not be able to open the right doors for them.
That’s why we’ve decided to create a fund with a truly pan-European focus. There’s such a large opportunity here for firms that are underserved by the current market. We’ll still be investing in some companies in the US and Israel – simply put, there are some amazing opportunities that we just don’t want to miss out on – but we’re most excited about capitalising on this relatively untapped opportunity in Europe.
What sort of challenges and opportunities are you currently facing? What’s your main focus?
Carlos Alberto Silva: Given that we only launched the fund last week, we’ve not run into too many challenges yet! That being said, of course, the economic climate is not the best. This is a challenge that every venture capital fund and company must face.
Cybersecurity as a whole is also well insulated from the economic downturn. That’s because strong cybersecurity is not a ‘nice-to-have’ – but critical. That’s not going to change – from digital transformation to national security, cyber will continue being a top priority for governments, institutions, companies, and investors across the globe, and the market is expected to reach $162 billion in 2022, with robust annual double-digit growth forecast for the coming years – and so the companies we’ll be looking at have some in-built resilience.
How can you find the right balance between locating promising new businesses and researching potential investments?
Carlos Moreira da Silva: This is not generally something we struggle with. This is probably because we follow a thesis-driven approach that means we spend a lot of time looking at which spaces we want to cover before making any investment decisions.
Of course, we stay up to date with the industry, look at all publicly available sources, and attend the most relevant cybersecurity events across Europe, Israel, and the US. This is all fairly common sense.
But we do rely heavily on our proprietary network of close VCs and advisors. Our network is always totally invaluable when we are looking to identify the best leads for future investments. Our strategic advisors – including leading entrepreneurs, experts, and cybersecurity decision-makers such Brian NeSmith (Arctic Wolf), Eyal Hayardeny (Reblaze), Nuno Sebastião (Feedzai), and Pierre Polette (Hackuity) – all founders of companies we’ve invested in in the past – possess an incredible depth and breadth of sector-specific knowledge and experience that, added to our own, really helps us identify and support the founders and companies with the biggest breakthrough and scaling potential.
We spend a long time talking to prospective investee companies, ideally as early in their journey as possible, and working out where we can help them. If we can make an introduction to a potential customer, for example, we will do so even before we have made any investment. We’ve worked hard to build a reputation in the industry for being supportive of the whole industry – that’s really important to us.
How much research does it take to identify companies you want to invest in? When it comes to cutting-edge technology, it can be complicated to distinguish between things that seem important but aren’t and things that don’t seem important but are.
Carlos Alberto Silva: For most first-time funds the process of identifying the right companies to invest in across such a large geographic area would be difficult. But our team has been together for many years now. We may be a first-time fund, but we’re far from a first-time team.
We know this space well and we have a strong network that reaches across the US, Europe, and Israel. In fact, much of the research you refer to has in effect already been done. We already have a list of companies that we’re interested in, and in many cases have already started the conversation.
We want to back visionary companies in emerging sectors. We want to invest in those who are the very first or one of the very first to solve a particular problem. In our view, jumping on bandwagons or entering already saturated markets will inevitably lead to meagre returns. Get in on the ground floor and you’ve got a lot more room to grow into.
What advice would you give to cybersecurity startup founders looking for investors?
Carlos Moreira da Silva: Beyond the obvious – how much are they willing to invest – there are a couple of really important things for founders to look at. Firstly, look at their track record. Cybersecurity is a space where deep technical knowledge is really important. Think of it this way: if you have to explain what your company does through metaphors and hand-holding, then they probably aren’t going to be much help beyond providing cash stimulus.
The second thing to look at is their network. Well-connected investors with the right contacts in cybersecurity will prove invaluable. Most venture capital investors will have a long list of contacts. You can pick that up by going to the right events and spending enough time in the space. But the investors that will provide you with real benefit are those who have a long list of friends – with deep and genuine relationships. The right introduction can be game-changing for a company, so it’s vital your investor’s network is robust.
What tips do you have for maintaining a positive rapport with company founders? What makes for a quality relationship?
Carlos Moreira da Silva: It may sound obvious, but in our experience, the most important thing for building rapport is having a solid understanding of the business. It is important to be there for the founders during the good times, but especially during the challenging times, when they really need that extra help. Of course, you must understand how the company’s key product or service works.
But beyond that, you must understand everything from the pain points of their customers to the market for talent in their sector to the opportunities for growth. This is not stuff you can pick up overnight, and entrepreneurs are good at picking those with genuine knowledge out from the blaggers.
And, in our case, we can share our global perspective regarding the wider market environment. You can provide an enormous amount of value here.
We also think it helps that we’ve been in their position before. We’re not just investors, we’ve held senior executive roles in cybersecurity companies and effectively built them from the ground up. So, we understand the nuances of the day-to-day running of a business, and that helps us build a foundation of trust – which really is essential to a successful relationship.
There is an unofficial patch from 0patch for a Zero-Day flaw in Microsoft Windows that allows bypassing the MotW (Mark-of-the-Web) protections that are built into the operating system and at moment it’s actively exploited.
By utilizing files signed with malformed signatures, this zero-day flaw is able to bypass MotW protections. Various legacy Windows versions as well as all versions that are supported by Microsoft are affected by the issue.
It has been determined by cybersecurity analysts that the Magniber ransomware was being installed on victims’ devices with the help of stand-alone JavaScript files by threat actors.
Why does Windows 8.1 not have the behavior where a corrupt signature skips the MotW prompting? Windows 10 and newer MotW prompting is sort of intermingled with SmartScreen by default. If you turn off "Check apps and files", you'll get behavior more like earlier Windows versions. pic.twitter.com/T6k3xNKOFY
0patch released this unofficial security patch to fix this flaw since it’s a critical zero-day vulnerability and is exploited by threat actors vigorously in the wild.
Why this patch has been tagged as “Unofficial”?
This patch is tagged as unofficial due to its release source, in short, this patch has not been released by Microsoft itself.
But, until the release of any official patch from Microsoft, users can use this security patch to keep their systems protected against threat actors exploiting this zero-day flaw.
Free Micropatch Availability
Due to this zero-day vulnerability, multiple Windows versions are affected and here below we have mentioned all the affected versions of Windows that are eligible for the free micropatches:-
Windows 11 v21H2
Windows 10 v21H2
Windows 10 v21H1
Windows 10 v20H2
Windows 10 v2004
Windows 10 v1909
Windows 10 v1903
Windows 10 v1809
Windows 10 v1803
Windows Server 2022
Windows Server 2019
The installation process for this micropatch will require an account on the 0patch website, and it can be created for free. Once done, you’ll need to download its agent for your Windows device which will automatically install this patch.
During recent research, Microsoft has discovered evidence of a complex interconnected malware ecosystem that is associated with the Raspberry Robin worm.
With other malware families, there are several root links to the Raspberry Robin worm were identified. Even security experts have detected that it uses alternate infection tactics as well.
Infections like these lead to a variety of complications and here below we have listed them:-
Hands-on-keyboard attacks: When attackers are already inside your environment following a breach, a hands-on keyboard attack will occur. It is a two-sided operation; on one end it’s the cybercriminal who sits at a keyboard, while on the other side it’s your compromised network that is being accessed.
Human-operated ransomware activity: It occurs when cybercriminals are involved in an active attack on a victim. Using this approach, an organization’s on-premises infrastructure is penetrated, privileges are elevated, and ransomware is deployed by the threat actors.
Compromised 1,000 Organizations
In the past 30 days, on more than 1000 organizations’ 3000 devices, the Raspberry Robin worm has initiated payload alerts. There have been instances where the Raspberry Robin worm has been installed on the victims’ systems with malware called FakeUpdates.
Raspberry Worm is also known as QNAP Worm, as for command-and-control, it uses the compromised QNAP storage servers. Through infected USB drives containing malicious. LNK files, Raspberry Robin spreads to other devices.
The worm will spawn a msiexec process using cmd[.]exe as soon as a USB device is attached.
In order to communicate with its C2 servers, the malware communicates with compromised Windows devices.
Raspberry Robin’s Connection
Microsoft Security Threat Intelligence Center (MSTIC) observed Raspberry Robin in October 2022, and it’s being used by DEV-0950, which is another actor who was also involved in the post-compromise activity.
As a result of the DEV-0950 activity, the Cobalt Strike was compromised through hands-on keyboard activity. The majority of the victims of DEV-0950 are traditionally acquired via phishing scams.
However, the operators of DEV-0950 have moved to use Raspberry Robin instead of the traditional method. The advantage of this approach is that the payloads can be delivered to existing infections and the campaigns can move to the stage of ransomware more quickly.
Mitigations
To mitigate the impact of this threat, it is also possible for defenders to apply the following mitigation measures:-
When mounting the drive, prevent autorun from being used and code from being executed.
Make sure the tamper protection setting is enabled in order to protect Microsoft Defender Antivirus from being interrupted by attacks.
It is very important to turn on cloud-delivered protection for Microsoft Defender Antivirus or your antivirus software counterpart if it supports the feature.
The USB port should be blocked from running untrusted or unsigned processes.
Scripts that may be obfuscated should be blocked from being executed.
It is imperative to block executable files from running unless they fulfill all the trusted criteria.
The local security authority subsystem of Windows should be protected against credential theft.
In this Help Net Security video, Dmitry Bestuzhev, Most Distinguished Threat Researcher at BlackBerry, talks about some of the most interesting tactics, techniques, and procedures employed by cybercriminals in recent months.
A new version of Wireshark has been released recently by the Wireshark Team, it’s Wireshark 4.0.1, which contains several enhancements, new updates, and bug fixes.
Wireshark is one of the most widely used open-source free software packet analyzers that are currently available on the market, and it is available in a variety of options for different platforms.
There are many people who use Wireshark packet analyzers for the analysis of packets, not just network administrators only. As security analysts also use Wireshark packet analyzers for packet analysis purposes.
Several organizations make use of this tool to manage and monitor all the activities of their business operations on a regular basis.
Wireshark recently released its Wireshark 4.0.0 and the current Wireshark 4.0.1 is a quick update from the previous one.
Platform Support
For all the major platforms or operating systems, the Wireshark 4.0.1 packet analyzer is available and here below we have mentioned them:-
Windows
Linux
macOS
BSD
What’s new in Wireshark 4.0.1?
There are several primary purposes for using Wireshark as a network protocol analyzer, including:-
Analysis
Troubleshooting
Education
Development
Wireshark 4.0 and later do not have any official 32-bit Windows packages that you can install on your computer. Qt 5.12.2 is now the standard version that ships with Windows installers. The previous version of these packages was Qt 6.2.3, which was shipped by default.
This release removes the experimental syntax for the display filter used in Wireshark 4.0.0 that allowed literals to be displayed just using angle brackets <…>. You can use the colon prefix instead while dealing with byte arrays.
As part of the criminal case against a former student of the University of Puerto Rico (UPR), a judge in Puerto Rico sentenced him to serve 13 months in federal prison.
The former student, Iván Santell-Velázquez (aka Slay3r_r00t) was accused of hacking over a dozen of the university’s female classmates’ email and Snapchat accounts.
On July 13, Ivan pled guilty to being a cyberstalker, admitting that he had targeted over 100 students in his online campaign. He also engaged in other schemes to steal information such as using spoofing and phishing.
He has been accused of harassing women and in some cases, he has published pictures that he has stolen from them in their nudist states between 2019 and 2021.
Apart from hacking student email accounts, he also managed to get access to multiple university email accounts by spoofing and phishing attempts through which he gathered personal information.
Students Data Stolen
The appellant, Iván Santell-Velázquez targeted 15 female students in total at the University of Puerto Rico. A victim of cyberstalking may experience a significant amount of emotional distress as a result of it.
“The prosecution of cyber criminals is a top priority in the Justice Department. Cybercrimes not only cause financial losses to corporate victims but also result in financial and psychological harm to vulnerable victims, oftentimes children or the elderly. This conduct will not be tolerated.”
“This case also demonstrates the importance of safeguarding personal information and passwords, and the care we must take when responding to suspicious e-mails and text messages.”
As a result of his illicit crimes, Iván Santell-Velázquez was sentenced to 13 months of rigorous imprisonment along with 2 years of supervised release for cyberstalking by Silvia Carreño Coll, the U.S. District Court Judge.
As data breaches’ financial and reputational costs continue to reach new heights, cybersecurity should be on top of mind for leadership across every industry.
Recent Proofpoint research found that 65% of board members believe their organization is at risk of material cyber attack in the next 12 months. Worryingly, 47% feel their organization is unprepared to cope with a targeted attack.
In this Help Net Security interview, Chris Konrad, Area Vice President of Security, Global Accounts at World Wide Technology, offers advice to CISOs that are increasingly under pressure, discusses using a security maturity model, discusses interesting security technologies, and more.
What advice would you give to a newly appointed CISO that strives to improve security strategy?
CISOs can no longer focus strictly on developing technical capabilities and protecting their organizations. Executives and boards are looking to CISOs to make investments that drive growth with a holistic security framework.
First, every CISO needs to know what their board’s mission and vision are, as well as what their risk appetite and tolerance are. You can’t secure what you can’t see. No security program can fully eliminate risk or human error, but a mature approach to cybersecurity can mitigate the risks that pose the most danger to organizational objectives and success.
The next step is conducting a comprehensive cybersecurity program assessment to know at what level of risk you are operating. This type of analysis provides rich insights that can be actioned to increase your security program maturity. This analysis also helps to maximize the use of people, processes and technology to reduce risk and increase efficiencies.
Risk management should be a C-suite priority because it is one of the single most important determinants of business value realization. Risk management is the system by which an organization’s portfolio is directed and controlled.
How can an organization leverage a security maturity model to assess its current infosec position?
A security maturity model can help CISOs measure, communicate and visualize improvements and investments in the security program. There are many different maturity models available to help you measure a security program. One I like is the Capability Maturity Model Integration (CMMI), a process improvement maturity model for the development of products and services, developed and published by the Software Engineering Institute of Carnegie Mellon University in Pittsburgh.
Using CMMI in combination with the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST), an organization can have one axis measuring people, process and technology and the other axis measuring maturity from nonexistent capability to optimized.
Of course, there is not a one-size-fits-all approach – so security teams must also work with the business to understand what is key to success, and ultimately, growth.
What cybersecurity technologies are you excited about? What can make a difference in this fast-paced threat landscape?
Most organizations are doing some form of tools rationalization or platform consolidation to get a better handle on their investments and reduce overlapping capability and spend. However, there are a few technologies that have caught my eye.
For me, I love seeing how AIOps can help organizations detect, assess and eliminate potential security vulnerabilities — before they are exploited by adversaries or those acting in bad faith. AIOps is starting to transform the way organizations tackle the complex cybersecurity ecosystem.
Innovative organizations, like Cribl, can receive machine data from any source and cleanse and enrich your data before routing it to any logging or SIEM platform, like Splunk, to reduce the total amount of data that needs to be managed. CrowdStrike is enhancing observability through modern log management with LogScale, which is built to ingest and retain streaming data as quickly as it arrives, regardless of volume. Alerts, scripts and dashboards are updated in real-time, and Live Tail and retained data searches have virtually no latency.
What are the biggest challenges the cybersecurity industry will face in the next five years?
Among the biggest challenges are that our adversaries are getting smarter, and they are leveraging much of the same technology that we use to defend ourselves. There is also a wider, and perhaps more concerning, issue around the shortage of skilled resources at a global level. Cybersecurity is one of the most important industries to safeguard our democratic value but more often than not, it’s seen as an overly technical, and therefore, not attractive career. We need to be shining the light on more routes into cyber roles and also accelerating diversity.
One area that’s often overlooked is identifying people within your organization and up-leveling them. Of course, those with earned experience have the hard skills to succeed, but I think an enthusiasm and drive to achieve is just as important. And by prioritizing STEM in early education, we further raise awareness of the field.
World Wide Technology employs thousands of professionals in the STEM fields across the globe and understands the urgency of supporting future tech leaders. WWT annually hosts its STEM Student Forum, an initiative dedicated to educating high school students on the importance of STEM disciplines and the opportunities they present, while also creating positive change in the St. Louis metropolitan area, where WWT’s global headquarters is located.
At its Dash 2022 conference, Datadog shared a report that found the primary security challenge organizations encounter in the Amazon Web Services (AWS) cloud is lax management of credentials.
Based on data collected from more than 600 organizations that rely on the Datadog platform to monitor their AWS cloud computing environments, the report also noted the complexity of the AWS identity and access management (IAM) service may lead organizations to publicly expose sensitive resources by accident.
Access keys are a static type of credential that do not expire. The Datadog report found 75% of AWS IAM users have an active access key that’s older than 90 days, while 25% have an active access key that’s older than one year and hasn’t been used in the past 30 days.
A total of 40% have also not used their credentials in the past 90 days, while 40% of organizations have at least one IAM user that has AWS Console access without multifactor authentication (MFA) enabled.
Andrew Krug, lead technical evangelist for security at Datadog, said managing cloud credentials is challenging because organizations often lack any offboarding processes to limit access when, for example, an employee leaves the company. As a result, cybercriminals that steal credentials are then able to easily gain access to cloud environments simply because organizations don’t rotate access keys, he added.
Datadog also noted that, by default, AWS provisions users at a root level that provides them with unlimited administrative permissions. Datadog found approximately 10% of organizations have an active root user access key. Some of these keys are up to 13 years old. A quarter of organizations (25%) had someone use root user credentials in the 30 days prior to the Datadog study. There may be a legitimate need for that level of access, but Krug noted the best practice is to employ least-privilege access whenever possible.
Other issues surfaced by Datadog pertain to how organizations configure cross-account access by using a resource-based IAM policy attached to the resource itself. The report found 18% of organizations that use the Amazon Simple Queue Service, for example, have at least one publicly exposed queue that enables anyone to receive or publish messages to those queues. More than a third of organizations that use the AWS S3 cloud storage service have at least one publicly exposed bucket.
Krug said it needs to be less complex to create secure IAM policies that grant least-privilege, granular permissions. It’s simply too easy to make a mistake, he added.
A fourth cloud security issue that’s widely overlooked is continued reliance on the first version of a EC2 Instance Metadata Service (IMDS) service that has known vulnerabilities. AWS has made available a more secure version, but Datadog found the vast majority of EC2 instances (93%) are not enforcing the usage of IMDSv2. Overall, 95% of organizations that use EC2 have at least one vulnerable instance. The second version of IMDS should be the default configuration, said Krug.
Finally, Datadog found at least 41% of organizations have adopted a multi-account strategy in AWS, with 6% of organizations using more than 10 AWS accounts. Datadog recommended centralizing accounts to make it easier to monitor who has gained access to a cloud computing environment.
Despite these issues, cloud platforms are still fundamentally more secure than on-premises IT environments. However, it’s also clear there is plenty of opportunity for mistakes to be made.
Third-party risk assessments are often described as time-consuming, repetitive, overwhelming, and outdated. Think about it: organizations, on average, have over 5,000 third parties, meaning they may feel the need to conduct over 5,000 risk assessments. In the old school method, that’s 5,000 redundant questionnaires. 5,000 long-winded Excel sheets. No wonder they feel this way.
The reason why risk assessments have become so dreaded is that it has always been a process of individual inspection and evaluation. For perspective, that’s roughly 14 risk assessments completed per day in the span of one year. How can we expect security, risk, and procurement professionals to get any other work done with this type of task on their plate? With the state of today’s threat landscape, wouldn’t you rather your security team be focused on actual analysis and mitigation, rather than just assessing? And, not to mention the fact that a tedious risk assessment process will contribute to burnout that can lead to poor employee retention within your security team. With how the cybersecurity job market is looking now, this isn’t a position any organization wants to be in.
So, now that you know how the people actually with their ‘hands in the pot’ feel about risk assessments, let’s take a look at why this approach is flawed and what organizations can do to build a better risk assessment process.
The never-ending risk assessment carousel ride
The key to defeating cybercriminals is to be vigilant and proactive. Not much can be done when you’re reacting to a security incident as the damage is already done. Unfortunately, the current approach to risk management is reactive, and full of gaps that do not provide an accurate view into overall risk levels. How so? Current processes only measure a point-in-time and do not account for the period while the assessment is being completed–or any breaches that occurred after the assessment was submitted. In other words, assessments will need to be routinely refilled out, a never-ending carousel ride, which is not feasible.
It should come to no surprise that assessments are not updated nearly as much as they should be, and that’s to no one’s fault. No one has the time to continually fill out long, redundant Excel sheets. And, not to mention, unless the data collected is standardized, very little can be done with it from an analysis point of view. As a result, assessments are basically thrown in a drawer and never see the light of day.
Every time a third-party breach occurs there is a groundswell of concern and company executives and board members immediately turn to their security team to order risk assessments, sending them on a wild goose chase. What they don’t realize is that ordering assessments after a third-party breach has occurred is already too late. And the organizations that are chosen for a deeper assessment are most likely not the ones with the highest risk. Like a never-ending carousel ride, the chase for risk assessments will never stop unless you hop off the ride now.
Show me the data!
The secret ingredient for developing a better risk management collection process is standardized data. You can’t make bread without flour, and you can’t have a robust risk management program without standardized data. Standardized data is the process of gathering data in a common format, making it easier to conduct an analysis and determine necessary next steps. Think of it this way, if you were looking at a chart comparing student test grades and they were all listed in various formats (0.75, 68%, 3/16, etc.), you would have a difficult time comparing these data points. However, if all the data is listed in percentages (80%, 67%, 92%, etc.), you could easily identify who is failing and needs more support in the classroom. This is the way using standardized data in the risk assessment process works. All data collected from assessments would be in the same format and you can understand which third parties are high risk and require prioritized mitigation.
CISOs who are still focused on point-in-time assessments are not getting it right. Organizations need to understand that risk assessment collection alone does not in fact equal reduced risk. While risk assessments are important, what you do with the risk assessment after it is complete is what really matters. Use it as a catalyst to create a larger, more contextual risk profile. Integrate threat intelligence, security ratings, machine learning, and other data sources and you’ll find yourself with all the data and insights you need and more to proactively reduce risk. You’ll be armed with the necessary information to mitigate risk and implement controls before the breach occurs, not the rushed patchwork after. A data-driven approach to third-party risk assessment will provide a more robust picture of risk and put an end to chasing assessments once and for all.
When moving to a cloud infrastructure, businesses should be looking toward a Zero Trust strategy. This security model protects the cloud from the inside out using the principle of least privilege to grant secure access to any company resource. Eliminating implicit trust helps prevent cloud-related data breaches and provides a security shield for remote workers that use BYOD (Bring Your Own Devices) to access corporate resources.
Zero Trust Prevents Compromised Credentials
Cloud environments are dynamic and require a lot of security, especially in a public cloud, where all data might not be protected and phishing attacks run rampant. In fact, 80% of cloud security incidents are due to stolen or lost credentials. Just earlier this year, the Lapsus$ ransomware group managed to breach a third party provider’s Okta authentication and even published screenshots for all to see.
This is where Zero Trust comes into the picture. Zero Trust helps mitigate unauthorized access in cloud environments by enforcing granular access to each user or device attempting to access a workload or resource. This added measure is essential for securing remote workers and third parties from any potential data leaks.
Organizations must adopt Zero Trust principles when building on cloud architectures. Here’s how your organization can successfully leverage the principles to keep cloud environments safe.
5 Ways Zero Trust Secures Cloud Environments
Always Assume a Threat
With traditional security methods, there’s no cause for concern until a threat is detected. And by that time, it’s too late. Zero trust automatically assumes by default that everyone using the network is a threat until verified.
Continuous Authentication
Following the ‘never trust, always verify’ motto, users will be continuously asked to verify themselves. Not on a one-time basis, but each time they require access to a cloud resource. Multi-Factor Authentication (MFA) technology is an integral component of a successful Zero Trust strategy.
Device Access Control
Zero Trust also monitors how many different devices are in the network as well as those trying to gain access at any given time. A proper Device Posture Check will ensure that every device is assessed for risk without any exposure to the network.
Microsegmentation
Microsegmentation is another way that Zero Trust protects cloud environments. It divides the infrastructure into smaller zones that require additional verification for access. This is also called minimizing the blast radius of a threat.
Lateral movement can occur when an attacker infiltrates the outside barrier and moves within the network. Even when the entry point is discovered with a traditional security method, it can be difficult to detect the threat. During the time it takes to find them, they can move laterally and exfiltrate data. Every user in the network is required to be verified when they enter different zones, drastically reducing the possibility of a breach.
Logging & Monitoring
Having several methods of verification means nothing without constant monitoring. Inspect and log all traffic to identify any suspicious behavior or anomalies. Analyzing the log data can help quickly identify threats and improve security policies.
October is Security Awareness Month, an exciting time as organizations around the world train people how to be cyber secure, both at work and at home. But what exactly is security awareness and, more importantly, why should we care about it?
The traditional approach does not work
Organizations, cybersecurity leaders and the cybersecurity community will all tell you the same thing: People represent the greatest security risk in today’s highly connected world. Organizations see it in their own incidents, and we see it in global data sets.
The most recent Verizon Data Breach Investigations Report (DBIR)- one of the industry’s most trusted reports – has pointed out that people were involved in over 80% of breaches globally. These incidents may involve people being targeted with phishing emails or smishing attacks, or people making mistakes (e.g., IT admins misconfiguring their cloud accounts and accidentally sharing sensitive data with the entire world).
If people represent such a high risk, what should we be doing about it?
The traditional approach has been (and often continues to be) to throw more technology at the problem. If cyber attackers are successfully phishing people with email, we will deploy security technologies that filter and stop phishing email attacks. If cyber attackers are compromising people’s passwords, we will implement multi-factor authentication. The problem is that cyber attackers bypass these technologies by targeting people.
As we get better at identifying and stopping phishing email attacks, cyber attackers target people’s mobile phones with smishing (SMS or message-based) attacks. As more and more organizations deploy MFA, cyber attackers began pestering people with MFA requests until they approve one (as recently happened at Uber).
This is where we also run into our second challenge: Security teams far too often blame people as the root cause of the human risk problem – as evidenced in often used phrases such as “People are the weakest link,” and “If our employees did what we told them to do, they and we would be secure.”
But when we look at cybersecurity from the average employee’s perspective, it turns out that the security community is often to blame. We have made cybersecurity so confusing, scary, and overwhelming that we have set people up for failure. People often have no idea what to do or, if they do know what to do, doing the right thing has become so difficult that they get it wrong or simply choose another option.
Just look at passwords, one of the biggest drivers of breaches. We’ve been saying for years that people continue to use weak passwords in an insecure manner, but the problem persists because the password policies we teach are confusing and constantly changing. For example, many organizations or websites have policies requiring complex passwords of 15 characters, including having upper and lower case letters, symbols, and numbers. Then we require people to change those passwords every ninety days but don’t provide a secure way to secure all those long, complex, and changing passwords.
Then we roll out MFA to help secure people but, once again, this is extremely confusing (even for me!). First, we have multiple different names for MFA, including two-factor authentication, two-step verification, strong authentication, or one-time passwords. Then we have multiple different ways to implement it including push notification, text messaging, FIDO token-based, authentication apps, etc. Every website you go to has a different name and implementation of this technology, and then we once again blame people for not using it.
From security awareness to managing human risk
Security awareness training has been the traditional approach, and it involves communicating to and training your workforce on how to be cyber secure. While a step in the right direction, we need to take this one step further: We need to manage human risk.
Managing human risk requires a far more strategic approach. It builds on security awareness, to include:
Risks: The security awareness team needs to be an integrated part of the security team, even reporting directly to the CISO. Their job should include working closely with other security elements (such as the security operations center, the cyber threat intelligence analysts, and the incident responders) to clearly identify the top human risks to the organization and the key behaviors that manage those risks. Once those key risks and behaviors have been identified and prioritized, then we can communicate with and train our workforce on those behaviors.
Policies: We need to start creating security policies, processes, and procedures that are far simpler for people to follow, we should be designing policies (and the tools that support them) with people in mind. If we want people to use strong authentication, we must focus on something that will be easy for people to learn and use. The more confusing and manual the process, the easier it is for cyber attackers to take advantage of that.
Security team: We need security teams to communicate to their workforce in simple, “human” terms that everyone can understand, including explaining the WHY of their requirements: Why are password managers important, what value does MFA have to them, and why enabling automatic updating is good for them. We must change the employees’ perception of the security team: from arrogant to approachable.
Managing human risk is becoming a fundamental part of every security leader’s strategy. Security awareness is the first step in the right direction as we attempt to communicate to, engage and train our workforce, but we need a more dedicated, strategic effort to truly manage human risk. Perhaps one day we will even grow and replace the role of the Security Awareness Officer with the Human Risk Officer.
The cybersecurity company Kaspersky detected almost 900 servers being compromised by sophisticated attackers leveraging the critical Zimbra Collaboration Suite (ZCS), which at the time was a zero-day without a patch for nearly 1.5 months.
“We investigated the threat and was able to confirm that unknown APT groups have actively been exploiting this vulnerability in the wild, one of which is systematically infecting all vulnerable servers in Central Asia”, Kaspersky
Zimbra Collaboration Suite (ZCS) Vulnerability
The vulnerability tracked as (CVE-2022-41352) is a remote code execution flaw that allows attackers to send an email with a malicious archive attachment that plants a web shell in the ZCS server while, at the same time, bypassing antivirus checks.
Kaspersky researchers say that various APT (advanced persistent threat) groups actively exploited the flaw soon after it was reported on the Zimbra forums.
Reports say a proof of concept for this vulnerability was added to the Metasploit framework, laying the groundwork for massive and global exploitation from even low-sophistication attackers.
Patch Available for the Vulnerability
Zimbra released a patch for this vulnerability; With ZCS version 9.0.0 P27, replacing the vulnerable component (cpio) with Pax and removing the weak part that made exploitation possible. Hence, update your devices immediately.
Researchers say performing disinfection on Zimbra is extremely difficult, since the attacker had access to configuration files containing passwords used by various service accounts.
Therefore, these credentials can be used to regain access to the server if the administrative panel is accessible from the internet.
Volexity stated that they identified approximately 1,600 ZCS servers that they believe were compromised by threat actors leveraging CVE-2022-41352 to plant webshells.
.@Volexity uncovers mass exploitation of #Zimbra Collaboration Servers (ZCS) via CVE-2022-27925 using authentication bypass. Over 1000 ZCS instances compromised worldwide. Read more about the exploit: https://t.co/NDtfZ5eFUZ#threatintel#dfir
Reports say the initial attacks started in September, targeting vulnerable Zimbra servers in India and some in Turkey. Therefore, it was probably a testing wave against low-interest targets to assess the effectiveness of the attack.
Notably, Kaspersky assessed that the threat actors compromised 44 servers during this initial wave. Later on the threat actors began to carry out mass targeting to compromise as many servers worldwide before admins patched the systems and close the door to intruders.
At present, the second wave had a greater impact, infecting 832 servers with malicious webshells. Hence, it is recommended to update your devices immediately.
While knowing full well that human lives may be at stake, criminal gangs have been increasingly targeting the healthcare sector with high-impact attacks like ransomware.
1. Tighten up email security
Healthcare providers should set up numerous layers of defense for a variety of email-borne threats. A good email security solution should be the first layer but will only be effective if it is able to detect multiple malicious signals (malicious IPs, suspicious URLs, hidden malware files, etc.).
Training staff to recognize malicious emails can be useful, but personnel should not bear the brunt of responsibility when it comes to catching signs of attack. Instead, training should focus on the importance of proper policies, such as confirming payments and transfers with a second channel outside of email.
2. Follow best practice for passwords and credentials
Obtaining login credentials is a primary goal in most cyberattacks, and many threat actors now specialize in selling information on to others. Investigations by the Trustwave SpiderLabs team found a large quantity of stolen login credentials and browser sessions enabling access to healthcare facilities advertised on dark web markets.
In addition to following best practices around phishing emails, all employees should be using complex passwords that can’t be easily guessed. When storing passwords, organizations must make sure to use modern and robust password hashing algorithms. Two-factor authentication should also be implemented across the organization as a priority (Note: SMS 2FA should not be considered secure).
3. Improve cyber security awareness
While the responsibility of spotting and stopping cyberattacks should not rest on ordinary healthcare personnel, a well-trained workforce can make a real difference in averting disaster. Attackers will be counting on healthcare staff being too busy and focused on supporting their patients to concentrate on security.
Security training is often limited to a few one-off PowerPoint-driven seminars, but this will do little to increase awareness. Healthcare providers should instead consider more in-depth exercises that replicate serious incidents such as ransomware attacks. This will help decision makers to gain experience in making snap decisions under pressure, better equipping them for when a real crisis looms.
4. Prepare for ransomware attacks
Ransomware is a threat to all sectors, but healthcare is particularly vulnerable to its disruptive effects. A paralyzed IT network will mean more than lost data or productivity – human lives may be on the line if data and equipment are locked down. Callous criminals are counting on healthcare providers caving and paying up to restore systems quickly. Further, attackers increasingly exfiltrate data to pile on more pressure and secure additional profits from dark web buyers.
A strong email security system will stop most malicious emails, but not all – and organizations should be prepared for that. Effective managed detection and response (MDR) capabilities, backed by a skilled team of threat hunters, will help identify and stop ransomware quickly to reduce its impact. A managed security service provider (MSSP) is one of the most affordable ways of acquiring these capabilities on a limited budget.
5. Secure extended IoT networks
Internet of Things (IoT)-enabled equipment has been hugely beneficial in enabling healthcare providers to automate and facilitate remote working. But if not properly monitored and patched, these connected devices can also provide threat actors with an easy attack path.
Hospitals are likely to have hundreds of devices deployed across their facilities, so keeping them all updated and patched can be an extremely resource-heavy task. Many health providers also struggle to accommodate the required downtime to update vital equipment.
Automating device discovery and update processes will make it easier to keep devices secured. Providers should also vet future purchases to ensure they have key security functionality and are accessible for maintenance and updates.
6. Understand supply chain risks
Healthcare providers sit in the center of extremely large and complex supply networks. Suppliers for medical materials, consultants, hardware, and facilities maintenance are just a few examples, alongside a growing number of digital services.
These suppliers often have a large degree of network connectivity or access to data, making them a prime target for threat actors seeking a way into the healthcare provider’s network. Organizations can also become the victim of a second-hand breach if a firm trusted to host or manage their data is attacked.
Supply chain risk can be reduced by vetting the security level of all third-party connections. This can be achieved without invasive network scans through publicly available information such as DNS server configurations and the presence of insecure ports open to the internet (e.g., MS-TERM-SERV, SMB, etc.).
7. Test out your preparations
Security is never a one-and-done affair. Even if the right solutions are in place, the workforce has been well-trained and processes are watertight, it is important to continually test defenses and look for ways to improve them.
Regular vulnerability scans are essential for keeping up with the shifting IT and cyber threat landscape. Application and network penetration tests will take things a step further by leveraging the ingenuity of experienced security personnel to look for a crack that can be found and exploited.
Larger healthcare providers such as hospitals may also consider physical penetration tests to determine if their facility’s IT infrastructure is vulnerable to an intruder on their grounds.
Defending against healthcare threats: Preparation is everything
Hospitals and other frontline healthcare providers are used to dealing with medical emergencies. Personnel have the equipment and processes they need in place, and they have the training to adopt the cool head needed to handle a crisis.
As attackers continue to target the sector, the same level of preparation is increasingly essential for cyber threats.
Criminal gangs are counting on budget cuts and staffing shortages to leave healthcare organizations vulnerable to their attacks. By focusing on these seven steps, providers will be able to present a hardened target that sends these callous opportunists in search of easier prey.
.png?ssl=1)
