InfoSec and Compliance – With 20 years of blogging experience, DISC InfoSec blog is dedicated to providing trusted insights and practical solutions for professionals and organizations navigating the evolving cybersecurity landscape. From cutting-edge threats to compliance strategies, this blog is your reliable resource for staying informed and secure. Dive into the content, connect with the community, and elevate your InfoSec expertise!
Artificial Intelligence (AI) stands as a paradox in the cybersecurity landscape. While it empowers attackers with tools to launch faster, more convincing scams, it also offers defenders unmatched capabilities—if used strategically.
1. AI: A Dual-Edged Sword The post emphasizes AI’s paradox in cybersecurity—it empowers attackers to launch sophisticated assaults while offering defenders potent tools to counteract those very threats
2. Rising Threats from Adversarial AI AI emerging risks, such as data poisoning and adversarial inputs that can subtly mislead or manipulate AI systems deployed for defense
3. Secure AI Lifecycle Practices To mitigate these threats, the article recommends implementing security across the entire AI lifecycle—covering design, development, deployment, and continual monitoring
4. Regulatory and Framework Alignment It points out the importance of adhering to standards like ISO and NIST, as well as upcoming regulations around AI safety, to ensure both compliance and security .
5. Human-AI Synergy A key insight is blending AI with human oversight/processes, such as threat modeling and red teaming, to maximize AI’s effectiveness while maintaining accountability
6. Continuous Adaptation and Education
Modern social engineering attacks have evolved beyond basic phishing emails. Today, they may come as deepfake videos of executives, convincingly realistic invoices, or well-timed scams exploiting current events or behavioral patterns.
The sophistication of these AI-powered attacks has rendered traditional cybersecurity tools inadequate. Defenders can no longer rely solely on static rules and conventional detection methods.
To stay ahead, organizations must counter AI threats with AI-driven defenses. This means deploying systems that can analyze behavioral patterns, verify identity authenticity, and detect subtle anomalies in real time.
Forward-thinking security teams are embedding AI into critical areas like endpoint protection, authentication, and threat detection. These adaptive systems provide proactive security rather than reactive fixes.
Ultimately, the goal is not to fear AI but to outsmart the adversaries who use it. By mastering and leveraging the same tools, defenders can shift the balance of power.
🧠 Case Study: AI-Generated Deepfake Voice Scam — $35 Million Heist
In 2023, a multinational company in the UK fell victim to a highly sophisticated AI-driven voice cloning attack. Fraudsters used deepfake audio to impersonate the company’s CEO, directing a senior executive to authorize a $35 million transfer to a fake supplier account. The cloned voice was realistic enough to bypass suspicion, especially because the attackers timed the call during a period when the CEO was known to be traveling.
This attack exploited AI-based social engineering and psychological trust cues, bypassing traditional cybersecurity defenses such as spam filters and endpoint protection.
Defense Lesson: To prevent such attacks, organizations are now adopting AI-enabled voice biometrics, real-time anomaly detection, and multi-factor human-in-the-loop verification for high-value transactions. Some are also training employees to identify subtle behavioral or contextual red flags, even when the source seems authentic.
In early 2023, a multinational company in Hong Kong lost over $25 million after employees were tricked by a deepfake video call featuring AI-generated replicas of senior executives. The attackers used AI to mimic voices and appearances convincingly enough to authorize fraudulent transfers—highlighting how far social engineering has advanced with AI.
Source: [CNN Business, Feb 2024 – “Scammers used deepfake video call to steal millions”]
This example reinforces the urgency of integrating AI into threat detection and identity verification systems, showing how traditional security tools are no longer sufficient against such deception.
“Whether you’re a technology professional, policymaker, academic, or simply a curious reader, this book will arm you with the knowledge to navigate the complex intersection of AI, security, and society.”
Many winery owners and executives—particularly those operating small to mid-sized, family-run estates—underestimate their exposure to cyber threats. Yet with the rise of direct-to-consumer channels like POS systems, wine clubs, and ecommerce platforms, these businesses now collect and store sensitive customer and employee data, including payment details, birthdates, and Social Security numbers. This makes them attractive targets for cybercriminals.
The Emerging Threat of Cyber-Physical Attacks
Wineries increasingly rely on automated production systems and IoT sensors to manage fermentation, temperature control, and chemical dosing. These digital tools can be manipulated by hackers to:
Disrupt production by altering temperature or chemical settings.
Spoil inventory through false sensor data or remote tampering.
Undermine trust by threatening product safety and quality.
A Cautionary Tale
While there are no public reports of terrorist attacks on the wine industry’s supply chain, the 1985 Austrian wine scandal is a stark reminder of what can happen when integrity is compromised. In that case, wine was adulterated with antifreeze (diethylene glycol) to manipulate taste—resulting in global recalls, destroyed reputations, and public health risks.
The lesson is clear: cyber and physical safety in the winery business are now deeply intertwined.
2. Why Vineyards and Wineries Are at Risk
High-value data: Personal and financial details stored in club databases or POS systems can be exploited and sold on the dark web.
Legacy systems & limited expertise: Many wineries rely on outdated IT infrastructure and lack in-house cybersecurity staff.
Regulatory complexity: Compliance with data privacy regulations like CCPA/CPRA adds to the burden, and gaps can lead to penalties.
Charming targets: Boutique and estate brands, which often emphasize hospitality and trust, can be unexpectedly appealing to attackers seeking vulnerable entry points.
3. Why It Matters
Reputation risk: A breach can shatter consumer trust—especially among affluent wine club customers who expect discretion and reliability.
Financial & legal exposure: Incidents may invite steep fines, ransomware costs, and lawsuits under privacy laws.
Operational disruption: Outages or ransomware can cripple point-of-sale and club systems, causing revenue loss and logistical headaches.
Competitive advantage: Secure operations can boost customer confidence, support audit and M&A readiness, and unlock better insurance or investor opportunities.
4. What You Can Do About It
Risk & compliance assessment: Discover vulnerabilities in systems, Wi‑Fi, and employee habits. Score your risk with a 10-page report for stakeholders.
Privacy compliance support: Navigate CCPA/CPRA (and PCI/GDPR as needed) to keep your winery legally sound.
Defense against phishing & ransomware: Conduct employee training, simulations, and implement defenses.
Security maturity roadmap: Prioritize improvements—like endpoint protection, firewalls, 2FA setups—and phase them according to your brand and budget.
Fractional vCISO support: Access quarterly executive consultations to align compliance and tech strategy without hiring full-time experts.
Optional services: Pen testing, PCI-DSS support, vendor reviews, and business continuity planning for deeper security.
DISC WinerySecure™ offers a tailored roadmap to safeguard your winery:
You don’t need to face this alone. We offer Free checklist + consultation.
DISC InfoSec Virtual CISO | Wine Industry Security & Compliance
Investing in a proactive security strategy isn’t just about avoiding threats—it’s about protecting your brand, securing compliance, and empowering growth. Contact DISC WinerySecure™ today for a free consultation.
Overview: DISC WinerySecure™ is a tailored cybersecurity and compliance service for small and mid-sized wineries. These businesses are increasingly reliant on digital systems (POS, ecommerce, wine clubs), yet often lack dedicated security staff. Our solution is cost-effective, easy to adopt, and customized to the wine industry.
Wineries may not seem like obvious cyber targets, but they hold valuable data—customer and employee details like social security numbers, payment info, and birthdates—that cybercriminals can exploit for identity theft and sell on the dark web. Even business financials are at risk.
Target Clients:
We care for the planet and your data
Wineries invest in luxury branding
Wineries considering mergers and acquisitions.
Wineries with 50–1000 employees
Using POS, wine club software, ecommerce, or logistics systems
Limited or no in-house IT/security expertise
🍷 Cyber & Compliance Protection for Wineries
Helping Napa & Sonoma Wineries Stay Secure, Compliant, and Trusted
🛡️ Why Wineries Are at Risk
Wineries today handle more sensitive data than ever—credit cards, wine club memberships, ecommerce sales, shipping details, and supplier records. Yet many rely on legacy systems, lack dedicated IT teams, and operate in a complex regulatory environment.
Cybercriminals know this. Wineries have become easy, high-value targets.
✅ Our Services
We offer fractional vCISO and compliance consulting tailored for small and mid-sized wineries:
🔒 Cybersecurity Risk Assessment – Discover hidden vulnerabilities in your systems, Wi-Fi, and employee habits.
📜 CCPA/CPRA Privacy Compliance – Ensure you’re protecting your customers’ personal data the California way.
🧪 Phishing & Ransomware Defense – Train your team to spot threats and test your defenses before attackers do.
🧰 Security Maturity Roadmap – Practical, phased improvements aligned with your business goals and brand.
🧾 Simple Risk Scorecard – A 10-page report you can share with investors, insurers, or partners.
🎯 Who This Is For
Family-run or boutique wineries with direct-to-consumer operations
Wineries investing in digital growth, but unsure how secure it is
Teams managing POS, ecommerce, club CRMs, M&A and vendor integrations
💡 Why It Matters
🏷️ Protect your brand reputation—especially with affluent wine club customers
💸 Avoid fines and lawsuits from privacy violations or breaches
🛍️ Boost customer confidence—safety sells
📉 Reduce downtime, ransomware risk, and compliance headaches
📞 Let’s Talk
Get a free 30-minute consultation or try our $49 Self-Assessment + 10-Page Risk Scorecard to see where you stand.
1. Evolving Role of Cybersecurity Services Traditional cybersecurity engagements—such as vulnerability patching, audits, or one-off assessments—tend to be short-term and reactive, addressing immediate concerns without long-term risk reduction. In contrast, end-to-end cybersecurity programs offer sustained value by embedding security into an organization’s core operations and strategic planning. This shift transforms cybersecurity from a technical task into a vital business enabler.
2. Strategic Provider-Client Relationship Delivering lasting cybersecurity outcomes requires service providers to move beyond technical support and establish strong partnerships with organizational leadership. Providers that engage at the executive level evolve from being IT vendors to trusted advisors. This elevated role allows them to align security with business objectives, providing continuous support rather than piecemeal fixes.
3. Core Components of a Strategic Cybersecurity Program A comprehensive end-to-end program must address several key domains: risk assessment and management, strategic planning, compliance and governance, business continuity, security awareness, incident response, third-party risk management, and executive reporting. Each area works in concert to strengthen the organization’s overall security posture and resilience.
4. Risk Assessment & Management A strategic cybersecurity initiative begins with a thorough risk assessment, providing visibility into vulnerabilities and their business impact. A complete asset inventory is essential, and follow-up includes risk prioritization, mitigation planning, and adapting defenses to evolving threats like ransomware. Ongoing risk management ensures that controls remain effective as business conditions change.
5. Strategic Planning & Roadmaps Once risks are understood, the next step is strategic planning. Providers collaborate with clients to create a cybersecurity roadmap that aligns with business goals and compliance obligations. This roadmap includes near-, mid-, and long-term goals, backed by security policies and metrics that guide decision-making and keep efforts aligned with the company’s direction.
6. Compliance & Governance With rising regulatory scrutiny, organizations must align with standards such as NIST, ISO 27001, HIPAA, SOC 2, PCI-DSS, and GDPR. Security providers help identify which regulations apply, assess current compliance gaps, and implement sustainable practices to meet ongoing obligations. This area remains underserved and represents an opportunity for significant impact.
7. Business Continuity & Disaster Recovery Effective security programs not only prevent breaches but also ensure operational continuity. Business Continuity Planning (BCP) and Disaster Recovery (DR) encompass infrastructure backups, alternate operations, and crisis communication strategies. Providers play a key role in building and testing these capabilities, reinforcing their value as strategic advisors.
8. Human-Centric Security & Response Preparedness People remain a major risk vector, so training and awareness are critical. Providers offer education programs, phishing simulations, and workshops to cultivate a security-aware culture. Incident response readiness is also essential—providers develop playbooks, assign roles, and simulate breaches to ensure rapid and coordinated responses to real threats.
9. Executive-Level Communication & Reporting A hallmark of high-value cybersecurity services is the ability to translate technical risks into business language. Clear executive reporting connects cybersecurity activities to business outcomes, supporting board-level decision-making and budget justification. This capability is key for client retention and helps providers secure long-term engagements.
Feedback
This clearly outlines how cybersecurity must evolve from reactive technical support into a strategic business function. The focus on continuous oversight, executive engagement, and alignment with organizational priorities is especially relevant in today’s complex threat landscape. The structure is logical and well-grounded in vCISO best practices. However, it could benefit from sharper differentiation between foundational services (like asset inventories) and advanced advisory (like executive communication). Emphasizing measurable outcomes—such as reduced incidents, improved audit results, or enhanced resilience—would also strengthen the business case. Overall, it’s a strong framework for any provider building or refining an end-to-end security program.
The article “How cyber security professionals are leveraging AWS tools” from Computer Weekly provides an in-depth look at how organizations utilize Amazon Web Services (AWS) to enhance their cybersecurity posture. Here is a rephrased summary of the key points and tools discussed, followed by my feedback.
1. Centralized Cloud Visibility and Operations
AWS offers cybersecurity professionals a unified view of their cloud environments, facilitating smoother operations. Tools like AWS CloudTrail and AWS Config enable teams to manage access, detect anomalies, and ensure real-time policy compliance. Integration with platforms such as Recorded Future further enhances risk orchestration capabilities.
2. Foundational Tools for Multi-Cloud Environments
In multi- or hybrid-cloud setups, AWS CloudTrail and AWS GuardDuty serve as foundational tools. They provide comprehensive insights into cloud activities, aiding in the identification and resolution of issues affecting corporate systems.
3. Scalability for Threat Analysis
AWS’s scalability is invaluable for threat analysis. It allows for the efficient processing of large volumes of threat data and supports the deployment of isolated research environments, maintaining the integrity of research infrastructures.
4. Comprehensive Security Toolset
Organizations like Graylog utilize a suite of AWS tools—including GuardDuty, Security Hub, Config, CloudTrail, Web Application Firewall (WAF), Inspector, and Identity and Access Management (IAM)—to secure customer instances. These tools are instrumental in anomaly detection, compliance, and risk management.
5. AI and Machine Learning Integration
AWS’s integration of artificial intelligence (AI) and machine learning (ML) enhances threat detection capabilities. These technologies power background threat tracking and provide automated alerts for security issues, data leaks, and suspicious activities, enabling proactive responses to potential crises.
6. Interoperability and Scalable Security Architecture
The interoperability of AWS tools like GuardDuty, Config, and IAM Access Analyzer allows for the creation of a scalable and cohesive security architecture. This integration is crucial for real-time monitoring, security posture management, and prevention of privilege sprawl.
7. Enhanced Threat Intelligence
AWS’s advanced threat intelligence capabilities, supported by AI-driven tools, enable the detection of sophisticated cyber threats. The platform’s ability to process vast amounts of data aids in identifying and responding to emerging threats effectively.
8. Support for Compliance and Risk Management
AWS tools assist organizations in meeting compliance requirements and managing risks. By providing detailed logs and monitoring capabilities, these tools support adherence to regulatory standards and internal security policies.
Feedback
The article effectively highlights the multifaceted ways in which AWS tools bolster cybersecurity efforts. The integration of AI and ML, coupled with a comprehensive suite of security tools, positions AWS as a robust platform for managing modern cyber threats. However, organizations must remain vigilant and ensure they are leveraging these tools to their full potential, continuously updating their strategies to adapt to the evolving threat landscape.
RSA 2025 spotlighted 10 innovative cybersecurity tools, including AI-driven email threat detection, phishing simulation agents, and autonomous security workflows. Vendors focused on securing AI models, improving visibility into non-human identities, and protecting APIs and AI agents from abuse. Tools for crowdsourced red teaming, binary-level vulnerability analysis, and real-time software architecture mapping also featured prominently. The trend is clear: automation, identity governance, and proactive threat exposure are front and center in the next generation of cybersecurity solutions.
Here’s a concise summary of CRN’s article on hot tools announced at RSA 2025:
1. AI in Security Operations Palo Alto Networks and CrowdStrike showcased advanced AI tools. Palo Alto’s Cortex XSIAM 3.0 introduced smarter email threat detection and noise-reducing vulnerability management. CrowdStrike launched agentic AI tools for automated security responses and workflow generation.
2. Smarter Phishing and Data Analysis Abnormal AI introduced two autonomous agents — one for personalized phishing training and another for digesting security data into actionable insights, streamlining analysis for cybersecurity teams.
3. Safe AI Model Training and Governance Netskope enhanced its DSPM with features to prevent sensitive data from being used in LLM training, along with improved AI policy enforcement and risk assessments.
4. Identity and Threat Detection Innovations Huntress expanded its Managed ITDR to tackle rogue apps and shadow workflows. Silverfort boosted non-human identity protections across cloud services, offering unified identity visibility.
5. New Approaches to Red Teaming and API Security Bugcrowd launched crowdsourced red teaming for real-world attack simulation. Wallarm introduced protection for AI agents themselves, guarding against prompt injection and other AI-specific threats.
6. Supply Chain and Application Insights NetRise’s ZeroLens tool detects undisclosed software flaws through binary analysis. Apiiro offered a visual graph tool for real-time understanding of software architecture and risk exposure.
🔧 Definition: Reproduces the exact behavior of one system on a different system. 🎯 Goal: Act like the real system, often for compatibility. 📦 Example: Running an old video game console on your PC using an emulator.
Key Traits:
Mimics both hardware and software behavior.
Used when accuracy is critical (e.g., legacy system support).
Slower but more faithful to original system.
Simulation
🧪 Definition: Models a system’s behavior to study or predict how it operates. 🎯 Goal: Understand or analyze system behavior, not necessarily replicate it exactly. 📊 Example: Simulating weather patterns or network traffic.
Key Traits:
Abstracts certain behaviors for analysis.
Focused on performance, outcomes, or patterns.
Often used in design, training, or testing.
👥 Analogy:
Emulation is like impersonating someone exactly—their voice, walk, habits.
Simulation is like creating a role-play of their behavior to study how they might act.
🔍 Emulation vs. Simulation: Side-by-Side Comparison
Feature
Emulation
Simulation
Purpose
Replicate exact behavior of a system
Model system behavior to understand, test, or predict outcomes
Accuracy
Very high – mimics original system closely
Approximate – focuses on behavior, not exact replication
Use Case
Compatibility, legacy system testing
Analysis, design, forecasting, training
Speed
Slower due to detailed replication
Faster due to abstraction
System Behavior
Includes full hardware/software behavior
Models only necessary parts of the system
Cybersecurity Example
Emulating malware in a sandbox to observe behavior
Simulating a DDoS attack to test how a network would respond
​The U.S. National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) has raised concerns about the security vulnerabilities inherent in artificial intelligence (AI) systems. In a recent report, NIST emphasizes that there is currently no foolproof method to defend AI technologies from adversarial attacks. The institute warns against accepting vendor claims of absolute AI security, noting that developers and users should be cautious of such assurances. ​
NIST’s research highlights several types of attacks that can compromise AI systems:​
Evasion Attacks: These occur when adversaries manipulate inputs to deceive AI models, leading to incorrect outputs.​
Poisoning Attacks: In these cases, attackers corrupt training data, causing the AI system to learn incorrect behaviors.​
Privacy Attacks: These involve extracting sensitive information from AI models, potentially leading to data breaches.​
Abuse Attacks: Here, legitimate sources of information are compromised to mislead the AI system’s operations. ​
NIST underscores that existing defenses against such attacks are insufficient and lack robust assurances. The agency calls on the broader tech community to develop more effective security measures to protect AI systems. ​
In response to these challenges, NIST has launched the Cybersecurity, Privacy, and AI Program. This initiative aims to support organizations in adapting their risk management strategies to address the evolving landscape of AI-related cybersecurity and privacy risks. ​
Overall, NIST’s findings serve as a cautionary reminder of the current limitations in AI security and the pressing need for continued research and development of robust defense mechanisms.
As vehicles become increasingly connected, integrating sensors, software, and internet connectivity, they offer enhanced safety and convenience features. However, this technological advancement also exposes them to significant cybersecurity risks, making them susceptible to hacking and unauthorized access.
A notable example occurred in 2024 when researchers, including Sam Curry, identified a vulnerability in Kia’s web portal. This flaw allowed unauthorized reassignment of control over internet-connected features in Kia vehicles manufactured after 2013. Similarly, certain Subaru models were found to be remotely hijackable and trackable due to security weaknesses.
The financial impact of such cyberattacks on the automotive industry is substantial. According to a report by VicOne, the industry faced approximately $22.5 billion in cyberattack costs, including $20 billion from data breaches, $1.9 billion due to system downtime, and $538 million in ransomware damages.
Modern vehicles are vulnerable to various cybersecurity threats, including remote hacks through Bluetooth, Wi-Fi, and cellular connections; physical access attacks via diagnostic ports like OBD-II; software vulnerabilities that can be exploited for unauthorized control or data theft; and malware or ransomware injections that can incapacitate vehicle systems.
In-vehicle networks such as the Controller Area Network (CAN) and Local Interconnect Network (LIN), which manage critical functions from engine control to seat adjustments, were not originally designed with security in mind. This oversight leaves them particularly susceptible to hacking. Implementing measures like encryption, authentication, and intrusion detection systems is essential to safeguard these networks.
The advent of autonomous vehicles introduces additional security concerns. Self-driving cars rely heavily on AI algorithms and sensor systems, necessitating robust cybersecurity measures to protect against both external and internal threats. Ensuring the integrity of communication between these components is critical for the safety of passengers and the public.
Manufacturers and regulators must prioritize cybersecurity in vehicle design and operation. This includes conducting thorough risk assessments, implementing comprehensive security protocols, and staying vigilant against emerging threats to protect consumers and maintain trust in automotive technologies.
MITRE CALDERA is an open-source cybersecurity platform developed by MITRE for automated adversary emulation and security assessment. It enables organizations to simulate real-world cyberattacks based on MITRE ATT&CK techniques to test and improve their defenses.
Key Features:
Automated Red Teaming – Simulates adversary behaviors using predefined or custom attack chains.
Run CALDERA: python3 server.py --insecure Access the web UI at http://localhost:8888 (default credentials: admin:admin). This default may not work in ver 5.0 – check conf/default.yml
2. Deploying Agents
CALDERA uses lightweight agents to simulate adversarial actions on endpoints.
Create New Adversary Profiles: Define a new attack sequence with custom scripts or commands.
Use Plugins: Enhance CALDERA with plugins like Stockpile (TTP Library) and Manx (Remote Access Tool).
Use Case Examples
Credential Dumping Simulation – Test if your security tools detect LSASS process memory access.
Lateral Movement Testing – Simulate adversaries moving between hosts using SMB or RDP.
Data Exfiltration Exercise – See if your DLP solutions flag unauthorized file transfers.
Creating Custom Attack Simulations in CALDERA
To build a tailored adversary emulation plan, you’ll need to create custom TTPs (Tactics, Techniques, and Procedures) and integrate them into an adversary profile.
Automating Response Testing – Check if your SIEM or SOAR detects and mitigates the attack.
Example for a specific attack scenario, like lateral movement or credential dumping:
Example: Simulating Lateral Movement Using CALDERA
Lateral movement techniques help assess an organization’s ability to detect and respond to adversaries moving across systems. In this example, we’ll create a CALDERA attack simulation that uses SMB-based remote command execution (ATT&CK ID: T1021.002).
1. Creating the Lateral Movement TTP (Ability)
We’ll define an ability that uses psexec (a common SMB-based remote execution tool).
Test Defense Evasion: Modify commands to use encoded PowerShell payloads.
Check SIEM Logs: Verify if your security tools detected and logged the lateral movement attempt.
Example: Simulating Lateral Movement on Linux Using SSH
Lateral movement on Linux often involves SSH-based remote command execution (MITRE ATT&CK ID: T1021.004). This simulation will test whether security controls detect an attacker moving across Linux systems via SSH.
1. Creating a Custom SSH Lateral Movement TTP (Ability)
yamlCopyEdit- id: fghij67890
name: Linux Lateral Movement Test
description: Simulates an adversary moving laterally via SSH on Linux
atomic_ordering:
- abcde12345
Save this file in caldera/data/adversaries/.
3. Running the Lateral Movement Simulation
Restart CALDERA to load the new configurations:bashCopyEditpython server.py --insecure
Deploy an Agent on an initial Linux system.
Ensure SSH Credentials Are Available:
Modify the agent to include SSH credentials using CALDERA’s fact system:cssCopyEditfact: {remote.user: "testuser", remote.pass: "password123", remote.host: "192.168.1.100"}
Create a New Operation:
Go to: Operations → Create Operation
Adversary Profile: Select Linux Lateral Movement Test
Assign an Agent
Start the Operation
Monitor Execution:
If successful, the target machine will have a file /tmp/loot.txt containing the username.
Check logs to verify execution.
4. Enhancing the Simulation
Use Key-Based Authentication Instead of Passwords:yamlCopyEditcommand: | ssh -i /home/#{remote.user}/.ssh/id_rsa #{remote.user}@#{remote.host} "whoami > /tmp/loot.txt"
Simulate Data Exfiltration: Copy files from the remote system using scp.
Test SIEM Detection: Ensure logs capture unauthorized SSH connections.
A Fortune 50 company recently made the largest known ransomware payment—a staggering $75 million—to the Dark Angels ransomware gang after 100 terabytes of data were stolen. Surprisingly, the company did not disclose the attack, even though SEC regulations require public companies to report significant cyber incidents. Unlike typical ransomware cases, the company’s systems were not shut down; they paid purely to keep the data private, highlighting the immense value organizations place on reputation.
Many companies choose to silence cyberattacks out of fear—concerned that disclosure could lead to customer loss, stock declines, and lawsuits. Executives often believe they won’t be targeted, treat each attack as an isolated event, or try to downplay incidents. Even with stricter SEC rules, businesses are finding ways to disclose as little as possible, fueling a cycle where ransom payments encourage more attacks.
This quiet ransom-paying culture increases risks across industries, making companies more attractive targets. Hackers are incentivized to continue their attacks, knowing that major corporations would rather pay up than risk public fallout. The more companies cave to these demands, the more cybercriminals are emboldened.
The solution? Proactive cybersecurity investments to build resilience before an attack happens. However, as history shows, preventive measures are a hard sell—many organizations react only after a crisis, rather than prioritizing security before disaster strikes. Breaking this cycle requires a mindset shift toward long-term cyber preparedness over short-term damage control.
The article highlights seven key cybersecurity projects that organizations should prioritize in 2025 to address emerging threats and enhance their security posture. These projects focus on leveraging advanced technologies, improving processes, and adapting to new regulations.
Summary:
Zero Trust Architecture: Organizations are increasingly adopting zero trust to minimize security risks by verifying all users and devices before granting access to resources.
AI-Powered Threat Detection: Leveraging artificial intelligence to detect and respond to sophisticated cyber threats in real time is becoming essential.
Cloud Security Enhancement: As cloud adoption grows, securing cloud environments and addressing risks like misconfigurations and unauthorized access remains a top priority.
Third-Party Risk Management: Businesses are focusing on assessing and mitigating risks posed by vendors and supply chain partners to safeguard sensitive data.
Endpoint Security Modernization: With remote work continuing, companies are upgrading endpoint protection to secure devices from advanced attacks.
Compliance Automation: Automating compliance workflows helps organizations meet regulatory requirements more efficiently while reducing human error.
Employee Awareness Programs: Regular training to combat phishing and social engineering attacks is vital for creating a security-conscious workforce.
These projects aim to strengthen resilience against evolving threats while aligning cybersecurity strategies with business objectives and regulatory demands.
For the first time ever researchers crack RSA and AES data encryption
Chinese scientists reveal D-Wave’s quantum computers can break RSA encryption, signaling an urgent need for new cryptography solutions.
A group of Chinese researchers has successfully cracked RSA and AES encryption using D-Wave quantum computers. This breakthrough marks the first time such widely used encryption methods have been defeated. RSA, used in digital security protocols like HTTPS, relies on the difficulty of factoring large prime numbers. AES, on the other hand, protects sensitive data by converting it into unintelligible code. Both encryption methods are foundational to modern cybersecurity and global data protection systems.
The researchers employed a combination of advanced quantum computing and innovative algorithms to break the encryption. Quantum computers, unlike classical systems, process information using quantum bits (qubits), enabling parallel computations at an unprecedented scale. This capability makes them uniquely suited to solving problems like factoring large numbers or solving complex mathematical challenges—processes essential for breaking RSA and AES.
This achievement signals an urgent need for post-quantum cryptography, which can withstand quantum attacks. Governments and technology organizations worldwide are now accelerating the development of cryptographic systems designed for this new era. This breakthrough emphasizes the importance of adopting quantum-resistant encryption to ensure long-term security for sensitive information in areas like banking, healthcare, and national defense.
The implications of this research extend beyond encryption. Quantum computing’s power could revolutionize fields such as medicine, artificial intelligence, and materials science. However, it also presents significant challenges to current cybersecurity practices. Researchers and policymakers must urgently address these dualities to harness quantum computing’s potential while mitigating its risks.
Cybersecurity involves technologies, processes, and measures aimed at safeguarding systems, networks, and data from cyber threats. A strong cybersecurity strategy minimizes the risk of attacks and prevents unauthorized access to systems, networks, and technologies.
Cybersecurity focuses on protecting computer systems from unauthorized access, damage, or events that would make them inaccessible.
People:
It is important that all staff are informed about how to identify and avoid common cyber threats, and for those responsible for the technical aspects of cybersecurity to keep up to date with the latest skills and qualifications.
Processes:
Processes are crucial in defining how the organization’s activities, roles, and documentation are used to mitigate the risks to the organization’s information. Cyber threats change quickly, so processes need to be continually reviewed to ensure you stay ahead.
Technology:
To mitigate cyber risks, you must first identify what risks your organization faces. From there, you can implement technological controls. Technology can be used to prevent or reduce the impact of cyber risks, depending on your risk assessment and the level of risk you consider acceptable.
Why is cybersecurity important?
The cost of cybersecurity breaches is risingEmerging privacy laws can mean significant fines for organizations. There are also non-financial costs to consider, like reputational damage.
Cyber attacks are increasingly sophisticated Cyber attacks continue to grow in sophistication. Attackers use an ever-expanding variety of tactics, including social engineering, malware, and ransomware.
Types of cybersecurity threats
Phishing
Phishing is a method of social engineering used to trick people into divulging sensitive or confidential information, often via email. These scams are not always easy to distinguish from genuine messages, and can inflict enormous damage on organizations.
Social engineering is used to deceive and manipulate victims into providing information or access to their computer. This is achieved by tricking users into clicking malicious links or opening malicious files, or by the attacker physically gaining access to a computer through deception.
Malware
Malware is short for “malicious software.” It can take the form of viruses, worms, Trojans, and other types of malicious code. Malware can be used to steal personal information, destroy data, and take control of computers.
Ransomware attacks
Ransomware is a form of malware that encrypts victims’ information and demands payment in return for the decryption key. Paying a ransom does not necessarily guarantee that you will be able to recover the encrypted data.
The article emphasizes the growing importance of cybersecurity as a boardroom priority in today’s digital economy. With cyber risks increasing, cybersecurity is no longer just a technical issue; it is a critical concern that board members must address to safeguard business operations, reputations, and financial health.
Key points include:
Cyber Threats Are Escalating: The frequency and severity of attacks like phishing and ransomware are rising, with the average cost of a data breach hitting $4.88 million. This creates both immediate and long-term impacts, such as financial loss, regulatory fines, and reputational damage.
Board Engagement Is Crucial: Board members must actively engage in shaping cybersecurity strategies, understanding key threats, allocating resources, and fostering a security culture throughout the organization.
Proactive Measures for Resilience: Boards should implement comprehensive cybersecurity frameworks (ISO, NIST e.g.,) prioritize employee training, and ensure robust incident response plans. Regular security assessments and simulations can help mitigate risks.
In summary, cybersecurity must be integrated into business strategy, with board members leading the charge to protect the organization’s future and maintain stakeholder trust. Cybersecurity is now a strategic imperative, essential for long-term resilience and sustainable growth.
You Can’t Keep Up with Emerging Threats or Technologies
Business Impact: Staying ahead of emerging threats and technologies is essential for protecting your business from cyberattacks. Falling behind can leave your business vulnerable to breaches, resulting in data loss, financial damage, and reputational harm. A cybersecurity consultant can help you stay current and implement the latest defenses, ensuring your business remains secure and competitive.
Expectation: CEOs should expect cybersecurity consultants to provide continuous education and training programs for their staff, ensuring the team stays updated with the latest cybersecurity trends and technologies. This empowers employees to recognize and respond to threats more effectively and reinforces a culture of security within the organization.
You Need an Impartial Security Assessment
Business Impact: Internal disagreements about security protocols can lead to inefficiencies and increased risk. An impartial assessment from a cybersecurity consultant can provide clarity, help to align your team and ensure that security measures are effective and unbiased. This can lead to a more cohesive security strategy and a more robust overall security posture.
Expectation: CEOs should expect cybersecurity consultants to conduct regular third-party security audits. These audits maintain an unbiased perspective on the company’s cybersecurity posture, uncover hidden vulnerabilities, and ensure that security measures evolve with the changing threat landscape.
You’re Lacking Innovation in Your Security Strategies
Business Impact: Innovation in security strategies is vital to staying ahead of cyber threats. A consultant brings fresh perspectives and innovative solutions that can enhance your existing security measures, leading to improved efficiency and effectiveness. This can result in cost savings, better resource allocation, and a more robust defense against cyber threats.
Expectation: CEOs should expect consultants to help establish a dedicated innovation team within the security department. This team should explore and integrate new technologies and methodologies, collaborating with the consultants to bring cutting-edge solutions to the organization.
You’re Unable to Meet Your Security Goals
Business Impact: Failing to meet security goals can expose your business to risks and hinder growth. A consultant can help identify the root causes of these challenges and provide actionable insights to achieve your objectives. Meeting security goals can enhance your business’s credibility, reduce the risk of breaches, and support overall business growth.
Expectation: CEOs should expect cybersecurity consultants to implement a structured framework like the NIST Cybersecurity Framework. This framework guides the security strategy and goal-setting processes, helping to identify gaps, set realistic goals, and track progress effectively.
Your Business Isn’t Growing, and You Don’t Know Why
Business Impact: Stagnant growth can indicate underlying security issues that are not immediately apparent. A cybersecurity consultant can conduct a thorough analysis to uncover hidden problems and provide solutions. Addressing these issues can remove barriers to growth, improve operational efficiency, and enhance your business’s financial performance.
Expectation: CEOs should expect cybersecurity consultants to perform a comprehensive security health check during the business strategy review. This health check identifies unseen security issues that may be hindering growth, and addressing them can streamline operations and enhance overall performance.
You’re Stalling on Implementing New Security Measures
Business Impact: Delaying important security initiatives can leave your business vulnerable and impede progress. A consultant can provide the expertise and resources needed to implement new security measures promptly. This can improve your security posture, reduce risk, and enable you to confidently take advantage of new business opportunities.
Expectation: CEOs should expect cybersecurity consultants to develop a clear, phased implementation plan for new security measures, prioritizing critical vulnerabilities first. This plan should include milestones and timelines to ensure steady progress and accountability.
You’re Working Outside Your Expertise
Business Impact: Focusing on areas outside your expertise can lead to suboptimal decisions and wasted resources. By hiring a cybersecurity consultant, you can ensure that specialized tasks are handled by experts, allowing you to focus on your strengths. This can lead to better decision-making, increased efficiency, and a higher quality of security measures.
Expectation: CEOs should expect cybersecurity consultants to establish a strategic partnership to handle specialized tasks. This ensures reliance on expert advice and services, allowing the CEO to focus on core business activities and leading to better overall outcomes.
You Lack In-House Security Expertise
Business Impact: A lack of in-house cybersecurity expertise can leave your business vulnerable to attacks and regulatory non-compliance. A consultant can fill this gap, providing the necessary skills and knowledge to protect your business. This can enhance your security posture, ensure compliance with industry regulations, and reduce the risk of costly breaches.
Expectation: CEOs should expect cybersecurity consultants to help implement an MSSP to supplement in-house capabilities. An MSSP provides continuous monitoring, threat detection, and response services, ensuring robust security even with limited internal resources.
You Have Tunnel Vision Regarding Security Issues
Business Impact: Working too closely on security problems can limit your perspective and lead to missed solutions. A consultant brings fresh eyes and can identify issues and solutions you might overlook. This can lead to more effective problem-solving, reduced risk, and improved overall security.
Expectation: CEOs should expect cybersecurity consultants to host regular brainstorming sessions with cross-functional teams. These sessions encourage diverse insights into security challenges, helping to uncover innovative solutions and prevent oversight.
You’re Working on a Time-Sensitive Security Project
Business Impact: Urgent security projects require expertise and efficiency to ensure success. A consultant can provide support to meet tight deadlines and achieve project goals.
Expectation: CEOs should expect cybersecurity consultants to utilize project management tools and methodologies like Agile to manage time-sensitive security projects efficiently. These tools streamline workflows, enhance collaboration, and meet critical deadlines without compromising quality.
FAQ’s
How do you verify the credentials and experience of a cybersecurity consultant?
To verify a cybersecurity consultant’s credentials and experience, you can:
Check Certifications: Look for reputable certifications like CISSP, CISM, CEH, or others recognized in the industry.
Review Past Projects: Ask for case studies or examples of past work that demonstrate their ability to handle challenges similar to yours.
Seek References: Contact previous clients to get feedback on their experiences with the consultant.
Interview Thoroughly: Conduct in-depth interviews to assess their knowledge, approach, and how they keep up with industry changes.
Assess Continuous Learning: Inquire about their commitment to ongoing education and professional development.
What are the typical costs associated with hiring a cybersecurity consultant?
The cost can vary widely based on factors such as the scope of work, the consultant’s experience, and the duration of the engagement. Typical costs might include:
Hourly Rates: Ranging from $150 to $500+ per hour.
Project-Based Fees: Project fees can range from a few thousand dollars to hundreds of thousands, depending on the complexity.
Retainer Agreements: Monthly retainers can range from $5,000 to $20,000 or more for ongoing support.
Discussing and agreeing on the fee structure upfront is essential to ensure it aligns with your budget and expectations.
What are the common red flags when interviewing potential cybersecurity consultants?
Some red flags to watch out for include:
Lack of Specific Experience: They must provide detailed examples of past projects or relevant experience.
Overemphasis on Certifications: While important, certifications alone don’t guarantee practical expertise.
Poor Communication Skills: Inability to clearly explain complex concepts or their approach to your specific issues.
Vague proposals lack details about how they will address your needs or what deliverables you can expect.
Unrealistic Promises: Guarantees of absolute security or immediate fixes are often unrealistic and should be scrutinized.
Can you provide examples of successful cybersecurity consultant engagements?
Examples of successful engagements include:
Incident Response: A consultant helped a mid-sized company recover from a ransomware attack by quickly identifying the breach, containing the threat, and restoring data from backups, minimizing downtime and data loss.
Security Program Development: A consultant worked with a healthcare provider to develop a comprehensive security program, achieving regulatory compliance and significantly reducing the risk of data breaches.
Vulnerability Assessment: For a financial services firm, a consultant conducted a thorough vulnerability assessment, identifying and addressing critical security gaps that previously went unnoticed, enhancing overall security posture.
.
How do cybersecurity consultants stay updated on the latest threats and technologies?
Cybersecurity consultants stay current by:
Continuous Education: Regularly attend training sessions and webinars and obtain advanced certifications.
Professional Networks: Being active in professional organizations like (ISC)², ISACA, and others, which offer resources and networking opportunities.
Industry Conferences: Participating in conferences such as Black Hat, DEF CON, and RSA Conference to learn about the latest trends and technologies.
Research and Publications: I read industry publications and research papers and participated in cybersecurity forums and discussions.
Hands-On Experience: Engaging in ongoing practical work and simulations to apply new techniques and tools in real-world scenarios.
This commitment to continuous learning ensures they can provide up-to-date and effective security solutions.
Some inauthentic networks used artificial intelligence in their campaigns to push certain political agendas, according to Meta.
Meta says it cracked down on propaganda campaigns on its platforms, including one that used AI to influence political discourse and create the illusion of wider support for certain viewpoints, according to its quarterly threat report published today. Some campaigns pushed political narratives about current events, including campaigns coming from Israel and Iran that posted in support of the Israeli government.
The networks used Facebook and Instagram accounts to try to influence political agendas around the world. The campaigns — some of which also originated in Bangladesh, China, and Croatia — used fake accounts to post in support of political movements, promote fake news outlets, or comment on the posts of legitimate news organizations.
A network originating in China, for example, consisted of several dozen Instagram and Facebook accounts, pages, and groups and was used to target global Sikh communities, Meta says. Another campaign traced to Israel used more than 500 Facebook and Instagram accounts to pose as local Jewish students, African Americans, and “concerned” citizens praising Israeli military actions and discussing campus antisemitism, among other types of content.
Some of the content shared by those two networks was likely created using generative AI tools, Meta writes. Accounts in the China-based campaign shared AI-generated images, and the Israeli campaign posted AI-generated comments, Meta found. The report says that, for now, AI-powered influence campaigns are not sophisticated enough to evade existing systems of detection.
Influence campaigns are regularly discovered on social media platforms. Earlier in May, TikTok said it had uncovered and disrupted a dozen such networks on its platform, including one that it traced to China.
Threat actors can use generative AI to write malware and more skilled cybercriminals could exfiltrate information from or inject contaminated data into the large language models (LLMs) that train GenAI.
Recent quantum computing and AI advancements are expected to challenge established cryptographic algorithms.
Today, enterprises block 18.5% of all AI transactions, a 577% increase from April to January, for a total of more than 2.6 billion blocked transactions.
Some of the most popular AI tools are also the most blocked. Indeed, ChatGPT holds the distinction of being both the most-used and most-blocked AI application.
Of the people who clicked on fraudulent links from supposed tax services, 68% lost money. Among those, 29% lost more than $2,500, and 17% lost more than $10,000.
9% of Americans feel confident in their ability to spot deepfake videos or recognize AI-generated audio, such as fake renditions of IRS agents.
HiddenLayer | AI Threat Landscape Report 2024 | March 2024
98% of companies surveyed view some of their AI models as vital for business success, and 77% have experienced breaches in their AI systems over the past year.
61% of IT leaders acknowledge shadow AI, solutions that are not officially known or under the control of the IT department, as a problem within their organizations.
Researchers revealed the extensive use of AI in modern businesses, noting an average of 1,689 AI models actively used by companies. This has made AI security a top priority, with 94% of IT leaders dedicating funds to safeguard their AI in 2024.
Code42 | Annual Data Exposure Report 2024 | March 2024
Since 2021, there has been a 28% average increase in monthly insider-driven data exposure, loss, leak, and theft events.
While 99% of companies have data protection solutions in place, 78% of cybersecurity leaders admit they’ve still had sensitive data breached, leaked, or exposed.
More than 95% of respondents believe dynamic content through Large Language Models (LLMs) makes detecting phishing attempts more challenging.
Phishing will remain the top social engineering threat to businesses throughout 2024, surpassing other threats like business email compromise, vishing, smishing or baiting.
88% of cybersecurity professionals believe that AI will significantly impact their jobs, now or in the near future, and 35% have already witnessed its effects.
75% of respondents are moderately to extremely concerned that AI will be used for cyberattacks or other malicious activities.
The survey revealed that 12% of respondents said their organizations had blocked all access to generative AI tools in the workplace.
Cisco | Cisco 2024 Data Privacy Benchmark Study | February 2024
63% have established limitations on what data can be entered, 61% have limits on which employees can use GenAI tools, and 27% said their organization had banned GenAI applications altogether for the time being.
Despite the costs and requirements privacy laws may impose on organizations, 80% of respondents said privacy laws have positively impacted them, and only 6% said the impact has been negative.
91% of organizations recognize they need to do more to reassure their customers that their data was being used only for intended and legitimate purposes in AI.
Some notable colleges and universities renowned for their cybersecurity programs and courses include:
Carnegie Mellon University (USA)
Information Networking Institute (INI)
The Information Networking Institute (INI) at Carnegie Mellon University (CMU) educates and develops engineers through technical, interdisciplinary master’s degree programs in information networking, security and mobile and IoT engineering that incorporate business and policy perspectives.
Institute for Information Security & Privacy (IISP)
The Georgia Institute of Technology’s Institute for Information Security & Privacy (IISP) is a research institution dedicated to advancing cybersecurity and privacy technologies. Established within Georgia Tech, the IISP serves as a focal point for interdisciplinary research, education, and collaboration in the field of information security and privacy.
MIT Department of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science
A joint venture between the Schwarzman College of Computing and the School of Engineering, EECS is grounded in three overlapping sub-units: electrical engineering (EE), computer science (CS), and artificial intelligence and decision-making (AI+D).
Cyber Policy Center and Computer Science Department
The Cyber Policy Center brings together researchers across the Stanford campus to solve the biggest issues in cybersecurity, governance and the future of work.
An independent subsidiary of SANS, the SANS Technology Institute offers graduate programs (master’s degree and graduate certificates) that develop technically-adept leaders and undergraduate programs (bachelor’s degree and undergraduate certificate) for people who want to enter the cybersecurity field.
The School of Information is a graduate research and education community committed to expanding access to information and to improving its usability, reliability, and credibility while preserving security and privacy. This requires the insights of scholars from diverse fields — information and computer science, design, social sciences, management, law, and policy.
The Department of Computer Science and Technology (formerly known as the Computer Laboratory) is the academic department within the University of Cambridge that encompasses computer science, along with many aspects of technology, engineering and mathematics.
The Global Cyber Security Capacity Centre (GCSCC) is an international centre for research on efficient and effective cybersecurity capacity-building, promoting an increase in the scale, pace, quality and impact of cybersecurity capacity-building initiatives across the world.
