InfoSec and Compliance – With 20 years of blogging experience, DISC InfoSec blog is dedicated to providing trusted insights and practical solutions for professionals and organizations navigating the evolving cybersecurity landscape. From cutting-edge threats to compliance strategies, this blog is your reliable resource for staying informed and secure. Dive into the content, connect with the community, and elevate your InfoSec expertise!
Data annotation, in which the significant elements of the data are added as metadata (e.g. information about data provenance or labels to aid with training a model)
Data provenance is crucial for AI systems because it ensures trust, accountability, and reliability in the data used for training and decision-making. Here’s why it matters:
Data Quality & Integrity – Knowing the source of data helps verify its accuracy and reliability, reducing biases and errors in AI models.
Regulatory Compliance – Many laws (e.g., GDPR, HIPAA) require organizations to track data origins and transformations to ensure compliance.
Bias Detection & Mitigation – Understanding data lineage helps identify and correct biases that could lead to unfair AI outcomes.
Reproducibility – AI models should produce consistent results under similar conditions; data provenance enables reproducibility by tracking inputs and transformations.
Security & Risk Management – Provenance helps detect unauthorized modifications, ensuring data integrity and reducing risks of poisoning attacks.
Ethical AI & Transparency – Clear documentation of data sources fosters trust in AI decisions, making them more explainable and accountable.
In short, data provenance is a foundational pillar for trustworthy, compliant, and ethical AI systems.
ISO 42001 Foundation – Master the fundamentals of AI governance.
ISO 42001 Lead Auditor – Gain the skills to audit AI Management Systems.
ISO 42001 Lead Implementer – Learn how to design and implement AIMS.
Accredited by ANSI National Accreditation Board (ANAB) through PECB, ensuring global recognition.
Are you ready to lead in the world of AI Management Systems? Get certified in ISO 42001 with our exclusive 20% discount on top-tier e-learning courses – including the certification exam!
Limited-time offer – Don’t miss out!Contact us today to secure your spot.
AI is reshaping industries by automating routine tasks, processing and analyzing vast amounts of data, and enhancing decision-making capabilities. Its ability to identify patterns, generate insights, and optimize processes enables businesses to operate more efficiently and strategically. However, along with its numerous advantages, AI also presents challenges such as ethical concerns, bias in algorithms, data privacy risks, and potential job displacement. By gaining a comprehensive understanding of AI’s fundamentals, as well as its risks and benefits, we can leverage its potential responsibly to foster innovation, drive sustainable growth, and create positive societal impact.
This serves as a template for evaluating internal and external business objectives (market needs) within the given context, ultimately aiding in defining the right scope for the organization.
Why Clause 4 in ISO 42001 is Critical for Success
Clause 4 (Context of the Organization) in ISO/IEC 42001 is fundamental because it sets the foundation for an effective AI Management System (AIMS). If this clause is not properly implemented, the entire AI governance framework could be misaligned with business objectives, regulatory requirements, and stakeholder expectations.
1. It Defines the Scope and Direction of AI Governance
Clause 4.1 – Understanding the Organization and Its Context ensures that AI governance is tailored to the organization’s specific risks, objectives, and industry landscape.
Without it: The AI strategy might be disconnected from business priorities.
With it: AI implementation is aligned with organizational goals, compliance, and risk management.
Clause 4 of ISO/IEC 42001:2023 (AI Management System Standard) focuses on the context of the organization. This clause requires organizations to define internal and external factors that influence their AI management system (AIMS). Here’s a breakdown of its key components:
1. Understanding the Organization and Its Context (4.1)
Identify external and internal issues that affect the AI Management System.
External factors may include regulatory landscape, industry trends, societal expectations, and technological advancements.
Internal factors can involve corporate policies, organizational structure, resources, and AI capabilities.
2. Understanding the Needs and Expectations of Stakeholders (4.2)
Determine their needs, expectations, and concerns related to AI use.
Consider legal, regulatory, and contractual requirements.
3. Determining the Scope of the AI Management System (4.3)
Define the boundaries and applicability of AIMS based on identified factors.
Consider organizational units, functions, and jurisdictions in scope.
Ensure alignment with business objectives and compliance obligations.
4. AI Management System (AIMS) and Its Implementation (4.4)
Establish, implement, maintain, and continuously improve the AIMS.
Ensure it aligns with organizational goals and risk management practices.
Integrate AI governance, ethics, risk, and compliance into business operations.
Why This Matters
Clause 4 ensures that organizations build their AI governance framework with a strong foundation, considering all relevant factors before implementing AI-related controls. It aligns AI initiatives with business strategy, regulatory compliance, and stakeholder expectations.
Here are the options:
4.1 – Understanding the Organization and Its Context
4.2 – Understanding the Needs and Expectations of Stakeholders
4.3 – Determining the Scope of the AI Management System (AIMS)
4.4 – AI Management System (AIMS) and Its Implementation
Breakdown of “Understanding the Organization and its context”
Detailed Breakdown of Clause 4.1 – Understanding the Organization and Its Context (ISO 42001)
Clause 4.1 of ISO/IEC 42001:2023 requires an organization to determine internal and external factors that can affect its AI Management System (AIMS). This understanding helps in designing an effective AI governance framework.
1. Purpose of Clause 4.1
The main goal is to ensure that AI-related risks, opportunities, and strategic objectives align with the organization’s broader business environment. Organizations need to consider:
How AI impacts their operations.
What external and internal factors influence AI adoption, governance, and compliance.
How these factors shape the effectiveness of AIMS.
2. Key Requirements
Organizations must:
Identify External Issues: These are factors outside the organization that can impact AI governance, including:
Regulatory & Legal Landscape – AI laws, data protection (e.g., GDPR, AI Act), industry standards.
Technological Trends – Advancements in AI, ML frameworks, cloud computing, cybersecurity.
Market & Competitive Landscape – Competitor AI adoption, emerging business models.
Social & Ethical Concerns – Public perception, ethical AI principles (bias, fairness, transparency).
Identify Internal Issues: These factors exist within the organization and influence AIMS, such as:
AI Strategy & Objectives – Business goals for AI implementation.
Organizational Structure – AI governance roles, responsibilities, leadership commitment.
Capabilities & Resources – AI expertise, financial resources, infrastructure.
Data Governance & Security – Data availability, quality, security, and compliance.
Monitor & Review These Issues:
These factors are dynamic and should be reviewed regularly.
Organizations should track changes in external regulations, AI advancements, and internal policies.
3. Practical Implementation Steps
Conduct a PESTLE Analysis (Political, Economic, Social, Technological, Legal, Environmental) to map external factors.
Perform an Internal SWOT Analysis (Strengths, Weaknesses, Opportunities, Threats) for AI capabilities.
Engage Stakeholders (leadership, compliance, IT, data science teams) in discussions about AI risks and objectives.
Document Findings in an AI context assessment report to support AIMS planning.
4. Why It Matters
Clause 4.1 ensures that AI governance is not isolated but integrated into the organization’s strategic, operational, and compliance frameworks. A strong understanding of context helps in: ✅ Reducing AI-related risks (bias, security, regulatory non-compliance). ✅ Aligning AI adoption with business goals and ethical considerations. ✅ Preparing for evolving AI regulations and market demands.
Implementation Examples & Templates for Clause 4.1 (Understanding the Organization and Its Context) in ISO 42001
Here are practical examples and a template to help document and implement Clause 4.1 effectively.
1. Example: AI Governance in a Financial Institution
Scenario:
A bank is implementing an AI-based fraud detection system and needs to assess its internal and external context.
Step 1: Identify External Issues
Category
Identified Issues
Regulatory & Legal
GDPR, AI Act (EU), banking compliance rules.
Technological Trends
ML advancements in fraud detection, cloud AI.
Market Competition
Competitors adopting AI-driven risk assessment.
Social & Ethical
AI bias concerns in fraud detection models.
Step 2: Identify Internal Issues
Category
Identified Issues
AI Strategy
Improve fraud detection efficiency by 30%.
Organizational Structure
AI governance committee oversees compliance.
Resources
AI team with data scientists and compliance experts.
Policies & Processes
Data retention policy, ethical AI guidelines.
Step 3: Continuous Monitoring & Review
Quarterly regulatory updates for AI laws.
Ongoing performance evaluation of AI fraud detection models.
Stakeholder feedback sessions on AI transparency and fairness.
2. Template: AI Context Assessment Document
Use this template to document the context of your organization.
1. External Factors Affecting AI Management System
Factor Type
Description
Regulatory & Legal
[List relevant laws & regulations]
Technological Trends
[List emerging AI technologies]
Market Competition
[Describe AI adoption by competitors]
Social & Ethical Concerns
[Mention AI ethics, bias, transparency challenges]
2. Internal Factors Affecting AI Management System
Factor Type
Description
AI Strategy & Objectives
[Define AI goals & business alignment]
Organizational Structure
[List AI governance roles]
Resources & Expertise
[Describe team skills, tools, and funding]
Data Governance
[Outline data security, privacy, and compliance]
3. Monitoring & Review Process
Frequency of Review: [Monthly/Quarterly/Annually]
Responsible Team: [AI Governance Team / Compliance]
Methods: [Stakeholder meetings, compliance audits, AI performance reviews]
Next Steps
✅ Integrate this assessment into your AI Management System (AIMS). ✅ Update it regularly based on changing laws, risks, and market trends. ✅ Ensure alignment with ISO 42001 compliance and business goals.
Keep in mind that you can refine your context and expand your scope during your next internal/surveillance audit.
🚀 Unlock Your AI Governance Expertise with ISO 42001! 🎯
Are you ready to lead in the world of AI Management Systems? Get certified in ISO 42001 with our exclusive 20% discount on top-tier e-learning courses – including the certification exam!
✅ ISO 42001 Foundation – Master the fundamentals of AI governance. ✅ ISO 42001 Lead Auditor – Gain the skills to audit AI Management Systems. ✅ ISO 42001 Lead Implementer – Learn how to design and implement AIMS.
📌 Accredited by ANSI National Accreditation Board (ANAB) through PECB, ensuring global recognition.
🎯 Limited-time offer – Don’t miss out!Contact us today to secure your spot. 🚀
Artificial intelligence (AI) and machine learning (ML) systems are increasingly integral to business operations, but they also introduce significant security risks. Threats such as malware attacks or the deliberate insertion of misleading data into inadequately designed AI/ML systems can compromise data integrity and lead to the spread of false information. These incidents may result in severe consequences, including legal actions, financial losses, increased operational and insurance costs, diminished competitiveness, and reputational damage.
To mitigate AI-related security threats, organizations can implement specific controls outlined in ISO 27001. Key controls include:
A.5.9 Inventory of information and other associated assets: Maintaining a comprehensive inventory of information assets ensures that all AI/ML components are identified and managed appropriately.
A.5.12 Information classification: Classifying information processed by AI systems helps in applying suitable protection measures based on sensitivity and criticality.
A.5.14 Information transfer: Securing the transfer of data to and from AI systems prevents unauthorized access and data breaches.
A.5.15 Access control: Implementing strict access controls ensures that only authorized personnel can interact with AI systems and the data they process.
A.5.19 Information security in supplier relationships: Managing security within supplier relationships ensures that third-party providers handling AI components adhere to the organization’s security requirements.
A.5.31 Legal, statutory, regulatory, and contractual requirements: Complying with all relevant legal and regulatory obligations related to AI systems prevents legal complications.
A.8.25 Secure development life cycle: Integrating security practices throughout the AI system development life cycle ensures that security is considered at every stage, from design to deployment.
By implementing these controls, organizations can effectively manage the confidentiality, integrity, and availability of information processed by AI systems. This proactive approach not only safeguards against potential threats but also enhances overall information security posture.
In addition to these controls, organizations should conduct regular risk assessments to identify and address emerging AI-related threats. Continuous monitoring and updating of security measures are essential to adapt to the evolving landscape of AI technologies and associated risks.
Furthermore, fostering a culture of security awareness among employees, including training on AI-specific threats and best practices, can significantly reduce the likelihood of security incidents. Engaging with industry standards and staying informed about regulatory developments related to AI will also help organizations maintain compliance and strengthen their security frameworks.
Some AI frameworks and platforms support remote code execution (RCE) as a feature, often for legitimate use cases like distributed computing, model training, and inference. However, this can also pose security risks if not properly secured. Here are some notable examples:
1. AI Frameworks with Remote Execution Features
A. Jupyter Notebooks
Jupyter supports remote kernel execution, allowing users to run code on a remote server while interacting via a local browser.
If improperly configured (e.g., running on an open network without authentication), it can expose an unauthorized RCE risk.
B. Ray (for Distributed AI Computing)
Ray allows distributed execution of Python tasks across multiple nodes.
It enables remote function execution (@ray.remote) for parallel processing in machine learning workloads.
Misconfigured Ray clusters can be exploited for unauthorized code execution.
C. TensorFlow Serving & TorchServe
These frameworks execute model inference remotely, often exposing APIs for inference requests.
If the API allows arbitrary input (e.g., executing scripts inside the model environment), it can lead to RCE vulnerabilities.
D. Kubernetes & AI Workloads
AI workloads are often deployed in Kubernetes clusters, which allow remote execution via kubectl exec.
If Kubernetes RBAC is misconfigured, attackers could execute arbitrary code on AI nodes.
2. Platforms Offering Remote Code Execution
A. Google Colab
Allows users to execute Python code on remote GPUs/TPUs.
Though secure, running untrusted notebooks could execute malicious code remotely.
B. OpenAI API, Hugging Face Inference API
These platforms run AI models remotely and expose APIs for users.
They don’t expose direct RCE, but poorly designed API endpoints could introduce security risks.
Untrusted model execution (e.g., Colab, TorchServe)
Run models in isolated environments
Securing AI Workloads Against Remote Code Execution (RCE) Risks
AI workloads often involve remote execution of code, whether for model training, inference, or distributed computing. If not properly secured, these environments can be exploited for unauthorized code execution, leading to data breaches, malware injection, or full system compromise.
1. Common AI RCE Attack Vectors & Mitigation Strategies
Attack Vector
Risk
Mitigation
Jupyter Notebook Exposed Over the Internet
Unauthorized access to the environment, remote code execution
✅ Use strong authentication (token-based or OAuth) ✅ Restrict access to trusted IPs ✅ Disable root execution
Ray or Dask Cluster Misconfiguration
Attackers can execute arbitrary functions across nodes
✅ Use firewall rules to limit access ✅ Enforce TLS encryption between nodes ✅ Require authentication for remote task execution
Compromised Model File (ML Supply Chain Attack)
Malicious models can execute arbitrary code on inference
✅ Scan models for embedded scripts ✅ Run inference in an isolated environment (Docker/sandbox)
Unsecured AI APIs (TensorFlow Serving, TorchServe)
API could allow command injection through crafted inputs
✅ Implement strict input validation ✅ Run API endpoints with least privilege
Kubernetes Cluster with Weak RBAC
Attackers gain access to AI pods and execute commands
✅ Restrict kubectl exec privileges ✅ Use Kubernetes Network Policies to limit communication ✅ Rotate service account credentials
Serverless AI Functions (AWS Lambda, GCP Cloud Functions)
Code execution environment can be exploited via unvalidated input
✅ Use IAM policies to restrict execution rights ✅ Validate API payloads before execution
2. Best Practices for Securing AI Workloads
A. Secure Remote Execution in Jupyter Notebooks
Jupyter Notebooks are often used for AI development and testing but can be exploited if left exposed.
✅ Restrict access to localhost (--ip=127.0.0.1) ✅ Run Jupyter inside a container (Docker, Kubernetes) ✅ Use VPN or SSH tunneling instead of exposing ports
B. Lock Down Kubernetes & AI Workloads
Many AI frameworks (TensorFlow, PyTorch, Ray) run in Kubernetes, where misconfigurations can lead to container escapes and lateral movement.
GhostGPT is a new artificial intelligence (AI) tool that cybercriminals are exploiting to develop malicious software, breach systems, and craft convincing phishing emails. According to security researchers from Abnormal Security, GhostGPT is being sold on the messaging platform Telegram, with prices starting at $50 per week. Its appeal lies in its speed, user-friendliness, and the fact that it doesn’t store user conversations, making it challenging for authorities to trace activities back to individuals.
This trend isn’t isolated to GhostGPT; other AI tools like WormGPT are also being utilized for illicit purposes. These unethical AI models enable criminals to circumvent the security measures present in legitimate AI systems such as ChatGPT, Google Gemini, Claude, and Microsoft Copilot. The emergence of cracked AI models—modified versions of authentic AI tools—has further facilitated hackers’ access to powerful AI capabilities without restrictions. Security experts have observed a rise in the use of these tools for cybercrime since late 2024, posing significant concerns for the tech industry and security professionals. The misuse of AI in this manner threatens both businesses and individuals, as AI was intended to assist rather than harm.
Securing AI in the Enterprise: A Step-by-Step Guide
Establish AI Security Ownership Organizations must define clear ownership and accountability for AI security. Leadership should decide whether AI governance falls under a cross-functional committee, IT/security teams, or individual business units. Establishing policies, defining decision-making authority, and ensuring alignment across departments are key steps in successfully managing AI security from the start.
Identify and Mitigate AI Risks AI introduces unique risks, including regulatory compliance challenges, data privacy vulnerabilities, and algorithmic biases. Organizations must evaluate legal obligations (such as GDPR, HIPAA, and the EU AI Act), implement strong data protection measures, and address AI transparency concerns. Risk mitigation strategies should include continuous monitoring, security testing, clear governance policies, and incident response plans.
Adopt AI Security Best Practices Businesses should follow security best practices, such as starting with small AI implementations, maintaining human oversight, establishing technical guardrails, and deploying continuous monitoring. Strong cybersecurity measures—such as encryption, access controls, and regular security audits—are essential. Additionally, comprehensive employee training programs help ensure responsible AI usage.
Assess AI Needs and Set Measurable Goals AI implementation should align with business objectives, with clear milestones set for six months, one year, and beyond. Organizations should define success using key performance indicators (KPIs) such as revenue impact, efficiency improvements, and compliance adherence. Both quantitative and qualitative metrics should guide AI investments and decision-making.
Evaluate AI Tools and Security Measures When selecting AI tools, organizations must assess security, accuracy, scalability, usability, and compliance. AI solutions should have strong data protection mechanisms, clear ROI, and effective customization options. Evaluating AI tools using a structured approach ensures they meet security and business requirements.
Purchase and Implement AI Securely Before deploying AI solutions, businesses must ask key questions about effectiveness, performance, security, scalability, and compliance. Reviewing trial options, pricing models, and regulatory alignment (such as GDPR or CCPA compliance) is critical to selecting the right AI tool. AI security policies should be integrated into the organization’s broader cybersecurity framework.
Launch an AI Pilot Program with Security in Mind Organizations should begin with a controlled AI pilot to assess risks, validate performance, and ensure compliance before full deployment. This includes securing high-quality training data, implementing robust authentication controls, continuously monitoring performance, and gathering user feedback. Clear documentation and risk management strategies will help refine AI adoption in a secure and scalable manner.
By following these steps, enterprises can securely integrate AI, protect sensitive data, and ensure regulatory compliance while maximizing AI’s potential.
The article discusses how evolving regulations and AI-driven cyberattacks are reshaping the cybersecurity landscape. Key points include:
New Regulations: Governments are introducing stricter cybersecurity regulations, pushing organizations to enhance their compliance and risk management strategies.
AI-Powered Cyberattacks: The rise of AI is enabling more sophisticated attacks, such as automated phishing and advanced malware, forcing companies to adopt proactive defense measures.
Evolving Cybersecurity Strategies: Businesses are prioritizing the integration of AI-driven tools to bolster their security posture, focusing on threat detection, mitigation, and overall resilience.
Organizations must adapt quickly to address these challenges, balancing regulatory compliance with advanced technological solutions to stay secure.
AWS emphasizes the importance of threat modeling for securing generative AI workloads, focusing on balancing risk management and business outcomes. A robust threat model is essential across the AI lifecycle stages, including design, deployment, and operations. Risks specific to generative AI, such as model poisoning and data leakage, need proactive mitigation, with organizations tailoring risk tolerance to business needs. Regular testing for vulnerabilities, like malicious prompts, ensures resilience against evolving threats.
Generative AI applications follow a structured lifecycle, from identifying business objectives to monitoring deployed models. Security considerations should be integral from the start, with measures like synthetic threat simulations during testing. For applications on AWS, leveraging its security tools, such as Amazon Bedrock and OpenSearch, helps enforce role-based access controls and prevent unauthorized data exposure.
AWS promotes building secure AI solutions on its cloud, which offers over 300 security services. Customers can utilize AWS infrastructure’s compliance and privacy frameworks while tailoring controls to organizational needs. For instance, techniques like Retrieval-Augmented Generation ensure sensitive data is redacted before interaction with foundational models, minimizing risks.
Threat modeling is described as a collaborative process involving diverse roles—business stakeholders, developers, security experts, and adversarial thinkers. Consistency in approach and alignment with development workflows (e.g., Agile) ensures scalability and integration. Using existing tools for collaboration and issue tracking reduces friction, making threat modeling a standard step akin to unit testing.
Organizations are urged to align security practices with business priorities while maintaining flexibility. Regular audits and updates to models and controls help adapt to the dynamic AI threat landscape. AWS provides reference architectures and security matrices to guide organizations in implementing these best practices efficiently.
Threat composer threat statement builder
You can write and document these possible threats to your application in the form of threat statements. Threat statements are a way to maintain consistency and conciseness when you document your threat. At AWS, we adhere to a threat grammar which follows the syntax:
A [threat source] with [prerequisites] can [threat action] which leads to [threat impact], negatively impacting [impacted assets].
This threat grammar structure helps you to maintain consistency and allows you to iteratively write useful threat statements. As shown in Figure 2, Threat Composer provides you with this structure for new threat statements and includes examples to assist you.
Proactive governance is a continuous process of risk and threat identification, analysis and remediation. In addition, it also includes proactively updating policies, standards and procedures in response to emerging threats or regulatory changes.
Amid the rush to adopt AI, leaders face significant risks if they lack an understanding of the technology’s potential cyber threats. A PwC survey revealed that 40% of global leaders are unaware of generative AI’s risks, posing potential vulnerabilities. CISOs should take a leading role in assessing, implementing, and overseeing AI, as their expertise in risk management can ensure safer integration and focus on AI’s benefits. While some advocate for a chief AI officer, security remains integral, emphasizing the CISO’s/ vCISO’S strategic role in guiding responsible AI adoption.
CISOs are crucial in managing the security and compliance of AI adoption within organizations, especially with evolving regulations. Their role involves implementing a security-first approach and risk management strategies, which includes aligning AI goals through an AI consortium, collaborating with cybersecurity teams, and creating protective guardrails.
They guide acceptable risk tolerance, manage governance, and set controls for AI use. Whether securing AI consumption or developing solutions, CISOs must stay updated on AI risks and deploy relevant resources.
A strong security foundation is essential, involving comprehensive encryption, data protection, and adherence to regulations like the EU AI Act. CISOs enable informed cross-functional collaboration, ensuring robust monitoring and swift responses to potential threats.
As AI becomes mainstream, organizations must integrate security throughout the AI lifecycle to guard against GenAI-driven cyber threats, such as social engineering and exploitation of vulnerabilities. This requires proactive measures and ongoing workforce awareness to counter these challenges effectively.
“AI will touch every business function, even in ways that have yet to be predicted. As the bridge between security efforts and business goals, CISOs serve as gatekeepers for quality control and responsible AI use across the business. They can articulate the necessary ground for security integrations that avoid missteps in AI adoption and enable businesses to unlock AI’s full potential to drive better, more informed business outcomes. “
CISOs play a pivotal role in guiding responsible AI adoption to balance innovation with security and compliance. They need to implement security-first strategies and align AI goals with organizational risk tolerance through stakeholder collaboration and robust risk management frameworks. By integrating security throughout the AI lifecycle, CISOs/vCISOs help protect critical assets, adhere to regulations, and mitigate threats posed by GenAI. Vigilance against AI-driven attacks and fostering cross-functional cooperation ensures that organizations are prepared to address emerging risks and foster safe, strategic AI use.
Need expert guidance? Book a free 30-minute consultation with a vCISO.
The article on CSO Online covers how hackers may leverage machine learning for cyber attacks, including methods like automating social engineering, enhancing malware evasion, launching advanced spear-phishing, and creating adaptable attack strategies that evolve with new data. Machine learning could also help attackers mimic human behavior to bypass security protocols and tailor attacks based on behavioral analysis. This evolving threat landscape underscores the importance of proactive, ML-driven security defenses.
The article covers key ways hackers could leverage machine learning to enhance their cyberattacks:
Sophisticated Phishing: Machine learning enables attackers to tailor phishing emails that feel authentic and personally relevant, making phishing even more deceptive.
Exploit Development: AI-driven tools assist in uncovering zero-day vulnerabilities by automating and refining traditional techniques like fuzzing, which involves bombarding software with random inputs to expose weaknesses.
Malware Creation: Machine learning algorithms can make malware more evasive by adapting to the target’s security measures in real time, allowing it to slip through defenses.
Automated Reconnaissance: Hackers use AI to analyze massive data sets, such as social media profiles or organizational networks, to find weak points and personalize attacks.
Credential Stuffing and Brute Force: AI speeds up credential-stuffing attacks by automating the testing of large sets of stolen credentials against a variety of online platforms.
Deepfake Phishing: AI-generated audio and video deepfakes can impersonate trusted individuals, making social engineering attacks more convincing and difficult to detect.
AI-powered malware is increasingly adopting AI capabilities to improve traditional cyberattack techniques. Malware such as BlackMamba and EyeSpy leverage AI for activities like evading detection and conducting more sophisticated phishing attacks. These innovations are not entirely new but represent a refinement of existing malware strategies.
While AI enhances these attacks, its greatest danger lies in the automation of simple, widespread threats, potentially increasing the volume of attacks. To combat this, businesses need strong cybersecurity practices, including regular updates, training, and the integration of AI in defense systems for faster threat detection and response.
As with the future of AI-powered threats, AI’s impact on cybersecurity practitioners is likely to be more of a gradual change than an explosive upheaval. Rather than getting swept up in the hype or carried away by the doomsayers, security teams are better off doing what they’ve always done: keeping an eye on the future with both feet planted firmly in the present.
AI is revolutionizing audit, risk, and compliance by streamlining processes through automation. Tasks like data collection, control testing, and risk assessments, which were once time-consuming, are now being done faster and with more precision. This allows teams to focus on more critical strategic decisions.
In auditing, AI identifies anomalies and uncovers patterns in real-time, enhancing both the depth and accuracy of audits. AI’s ability to process large datasets also helps maintain compliance with evolving regulations like the EU’s AI Act, while mitigating human error.
Beyond audits, AI supports risk management by providing dynamic insights that adapt to changing threat landscapes. This enables continuous risk monitoring rather than periodic reviews, making organizations more responsive to emerging risks, including cybersecurity threats.
AI also plays a crucial role in bridging the gap between cybersecurity, compliance, and ESG (Environmental, Social, Governance) goals. It integrates these areas into a single strategy, allowing businesses to track and manage risks while aligning with sustainability initiatives and regulatory requirements.
The article highlights how the AI boom, especially in cybersecurity, is already showing signs of strain. Many AI startups, despite initial hype, are facing financial challenges, as they lack the funds to develop large language models (LLMs) independently. Larger companies are taking advantage by acquiring or licensing the technologies from these smaller firms at a bargain.
AI is just one piece of the broader cybersecurity puzzle, but it isn’t a silver bullet. Issues like system updates and cloud vulnerabilities remain critical, and AI-only security solutions may struggle without more comprehensive approaches.
Some efforts to set benchmarks for LLMs, like NIST, are underway, helping to establish standards in areas such as automated exploits and offensive security. However, AI startups face increasing difficulty competing with big players who have the resources to scale.
The article discusses security challenges associated with large language models (LLMs) and APIs, focusing on issues like prompt injection, data leakage, and model theft. It highlights vulnerabilities identified by OWASP, including insecure output handling and denial-of-service attacks. API flaws can expose sensitive data or allow unauthorized access. To mitigate these risks, it recommends implementing robust access controls, API rate limits, and runtime monitoring, while noting the need for better protections against AI-based attacks.
The post discusses defense strategies against attacks targeting large language models (LLMs). Providers are red-teaming systems to identify vulnerabilities, but this alone isn’t enough. It emphasizes the importance of monitoring API activity to prevent data exposure and defend against business logic abuse. Model theft (LLMjacking) is highlighted as a growing concern, where attackers exploit cloud-hosted LLMs for profit. Organizations must act swiftly to secure LLMs and avoid relying solely on third-party tools for protection.
The post highlights the rapid evolution of AI bots and their growing impact on internet security. Initially, bots performed simple, repetitive tasks, but modern AI bots leverage machine learning and natural language processing to engage in more complex activities.
Types of Bots:
Good Bots: Help with tasks like web indexing and customer support.
Malicious Bots: Involved in harmful activities like data scraping, account takeovers, DDoS attacks, and fraud.
Security Impacts:
AI bots are increasingly sophisticated, making cyberattacks more complex and difficult to detect. This has led to significant data breaches, resource drains, and a loss of trust in online services.
Defense Strategies:
Organizations are employing advanced detection algorithms, multi-factor authentication (MFA), CAPTCHA systems, and collaborating with cybersecurity firms to combat these threats.
Case studies show that companies across sectors are successfully reducing bot-related incidents by implementing these measures.
Future Directions:
AI-powered security solutions and regulatory efforts will play key roles in mitigating the threats posed by evolving AI bots. Industry collaboration will also be essential to staying ahead of these malicious actors.
The rise of AI bots brings both benefits and challenges to the internet landscape. While they can provide useful services, malicious bots present serious security threats. For organizations to safeguard their assets and uphold user trust, it’s essential to understand the impact of AI bots on internet security and deploy advanced mitigation strategies. As AI technology progresses, staying informed and proactive will be critical in navigating the increasingly complex internet security environment.
The blog post discusses how ISO 27001 can help address AI-related security risks. AI’s rapid development raises data security concerns. Bridget Kenyon, a CISO and key figure in ISO 27001:2022, highlights the human aspects of security vulnerabilities and the importance of user education and behavioral economics in addressing AI risks. The article suggests ISO 27001 offers a framework to mitigate these challenges effectively.
The impact of AI on security | How ISO 27001 can help address such risks and concerns.
The article emphasizes that AI cybersecurity must be multi-layered, like the systems it protects. Cybercriminals increasingly exploit large language models (LLMs) with attacks such as data poisoning, jailbreaks, and model extraction. To counter these threats, organizations must implement security strategies during the design, development, deployment, and operational phases of AI systems. Effective measures include data sanitization, cryptographic checks, adversarial input detection, and continuous testing. A holistic approach is needed to protect against growing AI-related cyber risks.
Benefits and Concerns of AI in Data Security and Privacy
Predictive analytics provides substantial benefits in cybersecurity by helping organizations forecast and mitigate threats before they arise. Using statistical analysis, machine learning, and behavioral insights, it highlights potential risks and vulnerabilities. Despite hurdles such as data quality, model complexity, and the dynamic nature of threats, adopting best practices and tools enhances its efficacy in threat detection and response. As cyber risks evolve, predictive analytics will be essential for proactive risk management and the protection of organizational data assets.
AI raises concerns about data privacy and security. Ensuring that AI tools comply with privacy regulations and protect sensitive information.
AI systems must adhere to privacy laws and regulations, such as GDPR, CPRA to protect individuals’ information. Compliance ensures ethical data handling practices.
Implementing robust security measures to protect data (data governance) from unauthorized access and breaches is critical. Data protection practices safeguard sensitive information and maintain trust.
1. Predictive Analytics in Cybersecurity
Predictive analytics offers substantial benefits by helping organizations anticipate and prevent cyber threats before they occur. It leverages statistical models, machine learning, and behavioral analysis to identify potential risks. These insights enable proactive measures, such as threat mitigation and vulnerability management, ensuring an organization’s defenses are always one step ahead.
2. AI and Data Privacy
AI systems raise concerns regarding data privacy and security, especially as they process sensitive information. Ensuring compliance with privacy regulations like GDPR and CPRA is crucial. Organizations must prioritize safeguarding personal data while using AI tools to maintain trust and avoid legal ramifications.
3. Security and Data Governance
Robust security measures are essential to protect data from breaches and unauthorized access. Implementing effective data governance ensures that sensitive information is managed, stored, and processed securely, thus maintaining organizational integrity and preventing potential data-related crises.
The rise of artificial intelligence (AI) has introduced new risks in software supply chains, particularly through open-source repositories like Hugging Face and GitHub. Cybercriminals, such as the NullBulge group, have begun targeting these repositories to poison data sets used for AI model training. These poisoned data sets can introduce misinformation or malicious code into AI systems, causing widespread disruption in AI-driven software and forcing companies to retrain models from scratch.
With AI systems relying heavily on vast open-source data sets, attackers have found it easier to infiltrate AI development pipelines. Compromised data sets can result in severe disruptions across AI supply chains, especially for businesses refining open-source models with proprietary data. As AI adoption grows, the challenge of maintaining data integrity, compliance, and security in open-source components becomes crucial for safeguarding AI advancements.
Open-source data sets are vital to AI development, as only large enterprises can afford to train models from scratch. However, these data sets, like LAION 5B, pose risks due to their size, making it difficult to ensure data quality and compliance. Cybercriminals exploit this by poisoning data sets, introducing malicious information that can compromise AI models. This ripple effect forces costly retraining efforts. The popularity of generative AI has further attracted attackers, heightening the risks across the entire AI supply chain.
The article emphasizes the importance of integrating security into all stages of AI development and usage, given the rise of AI-targeted cybercrime. Businesses must ensure traceability and explainability for AI outputs, keeping humans involved in the process. AI shouldn’t be seen solely as a cost-cutting tool, but rather as a technology that needs robust security measures. AI-powered security solutions can help analysts manage threats more effectively but should complement, not replace, human expertise.
For more detailed insights, check the full article here.
The IBM blog on AI risk management discusses how organizations can identify, mitigate, and address potential risks associated with AI technologies. AI risk management is a subset of AI governance, focusing specifically on preventing and addressing threats to AI systems. The blog outlines various types of risks—such as data, model, operational, and ethical/legal risks—and emphasizes the importance of frameworks like the NIST AI Risk Management Framework to ensure ethical, secure, and reliable AI deployment. Effective AI risk management enhances security, decision-making, regulatory compliance, and trust in AI systems.
AI risk management can help close this gap and empower organizations to harness AI systems’ full potential without compromising AI ethics or security.
Understanding the risks associated with AI systems
Like other types of security risk, AI risk can be understood as a measure of how likely a potential AI-related threat is to affect an organization and how much damage that threat would do.
While each AI model and use case is different, the risks of AI generally fall into four buckets:
Data risks
Model risks
Operational risks
Ethical and legal risks
The NIST AI Risk Management Framework (AI RMF)
In January 2023, the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) published the AI Risk Management Framework (AI RMF) to provide a structured approach to managing AI risks. The NIST AI RMF has since become a benchmark for AI risk management.
The AI RMF’s primary goal is to help organizations design, develop, deploy and use AI systems in a way that effectively manages risks and promotes trustworthy, responsible AI practices.
Developed in collaboration with the public and private sectors, the AI RMF is entirely voluntary and applicable across any company, industry or geography.
The framework is divided into two parts. Part 1 offers an overview of the risks and characteristics of trustworthy AI systems. Part 2, the AI RMF Core, outlines four functions to help organizations address AI system risks:
Govern: Creating an organizational culture of AI risk management
Map: Framing AI risks in specific business contexts
Predictive analytics offers significant benefits in cybersecurity by allowing organizations to foresee and mitigate potential threats before they occur. Using methods such as statistical analysis, machine learning, and behavioral analysis, predictive analytics can identify future risks and vulnerabilities. While challenges like data quality, model complexity, and evolving threats exist, employing best practices and suitable tools can improve its effectiveness in detecting cyber threats and managing risks. As cyber threats evolve, predictive analytics will be vital in proactively managing risks and protecting organizational information assets.
Trust Me: ISO 42001 AI Management System is the first book about the most important global AI management system standard: ISO 42001. The ISO 42001 standard is groundbreaking. It will have more impact than ISO 9001 as autonomous AI decision making becomes more prevalent.
Why Is AI Important?
AI autonomous decision making is all around us. It is in places we take for granted such as Siri or Alexa. AI is transforming how we live and work. It becomes critical we understand and trust this prevalent technology:
“Artificial intelligence systems have become increasingly prevalent in everyday life and enterprise settings, and they’re now often being used to support human decision making. These systems have grown increasingly complex and efficient, and AI holds the promise of uncovering valuable insights across a wide range of applications. But broad adoption of AI systems will require humans to trust their output.” (Trustworthy AI, IBM website, 2024)
Narrow AI (Weak AI): AI systems that are designed and trained for a specific task, such as facial recognition, language translation, or playing chess. These systems operate under a limited set of constraints and do not possess general intelligence. Examples include Siri, Alexa, and IBM’s Watson.
General AI (Strong AI): A theoretical form of AI that would have the ability to learn, understand, and apply intelligence across a wide range of tasks, much like a human being. General AI does not yet exist and remains a goal for future development.
Superintelligent AI: A hypothetical AI that surpasses human intelligence across all aspects, including creativity, decision-making, and emotional intelligence. This type is purely speculative at this point and often discussed in the context of ethical considerations and long-term AI safety.
2. Based on Functionality
Reactive Machines: The most basic type of AI that can only react to current situations without any memory or understanding of the past. An example is IBM’s Deep Blue, which played chess without learning from previous games.
Limited Memory: AI systems that can use past experiences or data to make decisions, albeit temporarily. Most modern AI applications, like self-driving cars, fall into this category as they use historical data to make real-time decisions.
Theory of Mind: This type of AI is in the conceptual stage and aims to understand human emotions, beliefs, and thoughts, and interact socially. Theory of Mind AI is not yet realized but is an area of active research.
Self-Aware AI: The most advanced form of AI, which would have its own consciousness, self-awareness, and emotions. This type does not currently exist and is largely a subject of science fiction and philosophical debate.
3. Based on Learning Techniques
AI comes in many forms. And while the general process of automated technology carrying out a series of tasks remains consistent, how and why this happens will vary. Here are some examples of different types of AI which you might come across.
Deep Learning
An evolution of machine learning, this more thorough approach sees AI programmed in such a way that they’re able to identify images, sounds, and text without the need for human input. While with machine learning you may have to physically describe an image to AI, with deep learning they will be able to process and understand it themselves.
Natural Language Processing (NLP)
If you’ve ever spoken to Siri, Alexa, or any other virtual assistant, you will have interacted with NLP. This technology is able to comprehend, manipulate, and generate human language in a way that allows it to have its very own “voice”. NLP can understand questions you give it, then respond accordingly. It can also be used in text form, such as a chatbot on a website.
Computer vision
This futuristic form of tech allows computers to interpret and analyze the human world through the classification of images and objects. In doing so, it allows an AI to see the world through the eyes of a living person. This kind of technology is most commonly associated with driverless cars, where the vehicle needs to be able to process the world around it as a normal driver would.
Machine Learning
This AI approach sees a series of data and algorithms run to formulate a picture of how a human would approach a situation or task. Over time, the program is able to adapt and even learn more about the human thinking process, which helps it to improve its overall accuracy.
Generative AI
A popular online fad in 2023, generative AI is the name given to technology which is able to create images, text, or other media independently. A user simply needs to input what they want created, with the AI able to draw on their input training to produce something that has similar characteristics.
Speech recognition
One of the oldest forms of AI, this tech is able to understand and interpret what you’re saying out loud, then convert it into text or audio format. This kind of technology is often confused with voice recognition – which instead of transcribing what you’re saying, will instead only be able to recognise the voice of the user.
Robotic Process Automation (RPA)
RPA technology is a software which makes it easier to build, deploy, and manage robots that emulate human interactions. The robotic helpers are able to carry out a number of tasks virtually, at speeds which humans would be incapable of replicating.
AI comes in many forms. And while the general process of automated technology carrying out a series of tasks remains consistent, how and why this happens will vary. Here are some examples of different types of AI which you might come across.
