Feb 12 2025

Some AI frameworks have remote code execution as a feature – explore common attack vectors and mitigation strategies

Category: AI,Remote codedisc7 @ 7:45 am

Some AI frameworks and platforms support remote code execution (RCE) as a feature, often for legitimate use cases like distributed computing, model training, and inference. However, this can also pose security risks if not properly secured. Here are some notable examples:

1. AI Frameworks with Remote Execution Features

A. Jupyter Notebooks

  • Jupyter supports remote kernel execution, allowing users to run code on a remote server while interacting via a local browser.
  • If improperly configured (e.g., running on an open network without authentication), it can expose an unauthorized RCE risk.

B. Ray (for Distributed AI Computing)

  • Ray allows distributed execution of Python tasks across multiple nodes.
  • It enables remote function execution (@ray.remote) for parallel processing in machine learning workloads.
  • Misconfigured Ray clusters can be exploited for unauthorized code execution.

C. TensorFlow Serving & TorchServe

  • These frameworks execute model inference remotely, often exposing APIs for inference requests.
  • If the API allows arbitrary input (e.g., executing scripts inside the model environment), it can lead to RCE vulnerabilities.

D. Kubernetes & AI Workloads

  • AI workloads are often deployed in Kubernetes clusters, which allow remote execution via kubectl exec.
  • If Kubernetes RBAC is misconfigured, attackers could execute arbitrary code on AI nodes.

2. Platforms Offering Remote Code Execution

A. Google Colab

  • Allows users to execute Python code on remote GPUs/TPUs.
  • Though secure, running untrusted notebooks could execute malicious code remotely.

B. OpenAI API, Hugging Face Inference API

  • These platforms run AI models remotely and expose APIs for users.
  • They don’t expose direct RCE, but poorly designed API endpoints could introduce security risks.

3. Security Risks & Mitigations

RiskMitigation
Unauthenticated remote access (e.g., Jupyter, Ray)Enable authentication & restrict network access
Arbitrary code execution via AI APIsImplement input validation & sandboxing
Misconfigured Kubernetes clustersEnforce RBAC & limit exec privileges
Untrusted model execution (e.g., Colab, TorchServe)Run models in isolated environments

Securing AI Workloads Against Remote Code Execution (RCE) Risks

AI workloads often involve remote execution of code, whether for model training, inference, or distributed computing. If not properly secured, these environments can be exploited for unauthorized code execution, leading to data breaches, malware injection, or full system compromise.


1. Common AI RCE Attack Vectors & Mitigation Strategies

Attack VectorRiskMitigation
Jupyter Notebook Exposed Over the InternetUnauthorized access to the environment, remote code execution✅ Use strong authentication (token-based or OAuth) ✅ Restrict access to trusted IPs ✅ Disable root execution
Ray or Dask Cluster MisconfigurationAttackers can execute arbitrary functions across nodes✅ Use firewall rules to limit access ✅ Enforce TLS encryption between nodes ✅ Require authentication for remote task execution
Compromised Model File (ML Supply Chain Attack)Malicious models can execute arbitrary code on inference✅ Scan models for embedded scripts ✅ Run inference in an isolated environment (Docker/sandbox)
Unsecured AI APIs (TensorFlow Serving, TorchServe)API could allow command injection through crafted inputs✅ Implement strict input validation ✅ Run API endpoints with least privilege
Kubernetes Cluster with Weak RBACAttackers gain access to AI pods and execute commands✅ Restrict kubectl exec privileges ✅ Use Kubernetes Network Policies to limit communication ✅ Rotate service account credentials
Serverless AI Functions (AWS Lambda, GCP Cloud Functions)Code execution environment can be exploited via unvalidated input✅ Use IAM policies to restrict execution rights ✅ Validate API payloads before execution

2. Best Practices for Securing AI Workloads

A. Secure Remote Execution in Jupyter Notebooks

Jupyter Notebooks are often used for AI development and testing but can be exploited if left exposed.

🔹 Recommended Configurations:
Enable password authentication:

bashCopyEditjupyter notebook --generate-config

Edit jupyter_notebook_config.py:

pythonCopyEditc.NotebookApp.password = 'hashed_password'

Restrict access to localhost (--ip=127.0.0.1)
Run Jupyter inside a container (Docker, Kubernetes)
Use VPN or SSH tunneling instead of exposing ports


B. Lock Down Kubernetes & AI Workloads

Many AI frameworks (TensorFlow, PyTorch, Ray) run in Kubernetes, where misconfigurations can lead to container escapes and lateral movement.

🔹 Key Security Measures:
Restrict kubectl exec privileges to prevent unauthorized command execution:

yamlCopyEditapiVersion: rbac.authorization.k8s.io/v1
kind: Role
metadata:
  namespace: default
  name: restrict-exec
rules:
- apiGroups: [""]
  resources: ["pods/exec"]
  verbs: ["get"]

Enforce Pod Security Policies (disable privileged containers, enforce seccomp profiles)
Limit AI workloads to isolated namespaces

Adversarial AI Attacks, Mitigations, and Defense Strategies: A cybersecurity professional’s guide to AI attacks, threat modeling, and securing AI with MLSecOps


InfoSec services
 | InfoSec books | Follow our blog | DISC llc is listed on The vCISO Directory | ISO 27k Chat bot | Comprehensive vCISO Services | ISMS Services | Security Risk Assessment Services

Tags: Adversarial AI Attacks, AI framwork, Remote Code Execution


Feb 14 2022

Adobe fixes zero-day exploit in e-commerce code: update now!

Category: Remote codeDISC @ 11:33 pm

There’s a remote code execution hole in Adobe e-commerce products – and cybercrooks are already exploiting it.

Using the Adobe Commerce online selling platform?

Using Magento, the free, open-source variant of the same product?

Buying products from online stores that use either of these?

Using online services that themselves use services that (…repeat up the supply chain as needed…) ultimately depend upon Magento or Adobe’s paid version?

If so, make sure that the site where Magento or Adobe Commerce is actually running has downloaded and applied Adobe’s latest patches.

Note that these are so-called out-of-band updates, meaning that they’re new enough not to have made it into last week’s regular Patch Tuesday updates, but critical enough not to be left until next month’s Patch Tuesday comes round.

The reason for the urgency is obvious from Adobe’s own security report:

Adobe has released security updates for Adobe Commerce and Magento Open Source. These updates resolve a vulnerability rated critical. Successful exploitation could lead to arbitrary code execution.

Adobe is aware that CVE-2022-24086

 has been exploited in the wild in very limited attacks targeting Adobe Commerce merchants.

Upgrade now

Of course, the words “limited attacks targeting merchants” shown above don’t automatically imply that “minimal damage has been done”.

Anyone who remembers the recent Colonial Pipeline ransomware incident will know how extensive the knock-on effects of a single cyberattack can be.

Also, until we know what the attackers did when they exploited this hole, we can’t tell how much data they made off with, how many users might be affected, or what follow-up crimes – such as identity theft, password recovery and account takeover – the crooks might be able to try next.

According to Adobe, it seems that any Adobe Commerce or Magento installation running a version later than 2.3.3 that hasn’t received the latest patches is vulnerable.

The patches provided are listed as tested for all of these versions: 2.3.3-p1 to 2.3.7-p2, and 2.4.0 to 2.4.3-p1.

Quite what version number will show up after patching we can’t tell you; the patch files themselves are identified as 2.4.3-p1_v1, so our assumption is that’s the version string you’ll see.

Tags: Adobe e-commerce, Remote Code Execution


Dec 13 2021

A JOURNEY FROM JNDI/LDAP MANIPULATION TO REMOTE CODE EXECUTION DREAM LAND PRESO

Category: Remote codeDISC @ 3:32 pm

Sandboxing remote code execution in the distributed system RCE: Sandbox based on Java and OSGi

Tags: Remote Code Execution


Jun 17 2019

U.S. Govt Achieves BlueKeep Remote Code Execution, Issues Alert

Category: Malware,Security IncidentDISC @ 8:57 am

The Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency (CISA) published an alert for Windows users to patch the critical severity Remote Desktop Services (RDS) RCE security flaw dubbed BlueKeep.

Source: U.S. Govt Achieves BlueKeep Remote Code Execution, Issues Alert

 
How to check if a target is vulnerable to the new RDP vulnerability (BlueKeep).


Enter your email address:

Delivered by FeedBurner




Tags: BlueKeep, RDP vulnerability, Remote Code Execution