May 21 2021

THE FULL STORY OF THE 2011 RSA HACK CAN FINALLY BE TOLD

Category: 2FA,Access Control,CryptograghyDISC @ 8:34 am

THE FULL STORY OF THE 2011 RSA HACK CAN FINALLY BE TOLD – Wired


May 18 2021

“Those aren’t my kids!” – Eufy camera owners report video mixups

Category: Access Control,Cyber surveillanceDISC @ 1:45 pm

This isn’t the first time we’ve heard of a SNAFU like this, where virtual wires got crossed inside a video surveillance company’s own back end, causing customers not only to lose track of their own video cameras but also to gain access to someone else’s.

In one case, three years ago, a user of a cloud video service offered by a UK company called Swann received a video notification that showed surveillance footage from the kitchen



just not the kitchen in the user’s own house.

Amusingly, if that is the right word, the victim in this incident just happened to be a BBC staffer, relaxing at the weekend, who was gifted an ideal story to write up in the upcoming week.

In that incident, the camera vendor blamed human error, with two cameras accidentally set up with a “unique identifier” that wasn’t unique at all, leaving the system unable to decide which camera belonged to which account.

Alhough the vendor dismissed it as a “one off”, the BBC tracked down an even more amusing (though no less worrying) occurrence of the same problem in which a user received a surveillance video of a property that looked like a pub.

With a few days of search engine wrangling, that user managed to identify the pub online, only to find out that it was, by fluke, just 5 miles away.

So he went there and took a picture of himself in the beer garden, via the pub landlord’s webcam, but using his own online account:

Dark World – A Guide to the Global Surveillance Industry

Tags: Cyber surveillance


Mar 25 2021

OpenSSL Project released 1.1.1k version to fix two High-severity flaws

Category: Access Control,CryptograghyDISC @ 10:46 pm

Tags: High-severity flaws, OpenSSL


Mar 16 2021

Using IAM Solutions to Beat Deepfakes and Fraud

Category: 2FA,Access Control,App Security,Identity TheftDISC @ 8:18 am
IAM fraud JumpCloud

AI and ML technologies have made great strides in helping organizations with cybersecurity, as well as with other tasks like chatbots that help with customer service.

Cybercriminals have also made great strides in using AI and ML for fraud.

“Today, fraud can happen without stealing someone else’s identity because fraudsters can create ‘synthetic identities’ with fake, personally identifiable information (PII),” explained Rick Song, co-founder and CEO of Persona, in an email interview. And fraudsters are leveraging new tricks, using the latest technologies, that allow them to slip past security systems and do things like open accounts where they rack up untraceable debt, steal Bitcoin holdings without detection, or simply redirect authentic purchases to a new address.

Some increasingly popular fraud tricks using AI and ML include:

  • Deepfakes that mimic live selfies in an attempt to circumvent security systems
  • Replicating a template across a dozen or more accounts to create fake IDs (these often use celebrity photos and their public data)
  • Mimicking the voice of high-level officials and corporate executives to extort personal information and money
  • Chatbots as phishing tools to gather personal information

“With this pace of evolution, companies are left at risk of holding the bag — they are not only losing money directly through things like loans and fees they can’t recoup and any restitution to impacted customers, but they’re also losing trust and credibility. Fraud costs the global economy over $5 trillion every year, but the reputational costs are hard to quantify,” said Song.

How IAM Tools Can Spot and Prevent High Tech Fraud

Tags: Deepfakes and Fraud, IAM Solutions


Mar 05 2021

External Remote Services

Category: Access Control,APTDISC @ 11:43 pm

Adversaries may leverage external-facing remote services to initially access and/or persist within a network. Remote services such as VPNs, Citrix, and other access mechanisms allow users to connect to internal enterprise network resources from external locations. There are often remote service gateways that manage connections and credential authentication for these services. Services such as Windows Remote Management can also be used externally.

Access to Valid Accounts to use the service is often a requirement, which could be obtained through credential pharming or by obtaining the credentials from users after compromising the enterprise network. Access to remote services may be used as a redundant or persistent access mechanism during an operation.

Detection

Follow best practices for detecting adversary use of Valid Accounts for authenticating to remote services. Collect authentication logs and analyze for unusual access patterns, windows of activity, and access outside of normal business hours.

Mitigations

  • Disable unnecessary external remote services.
  • Set account lockout policies to prevent password guessing.
  • Use two- or multi-factor authentication for such services.
  • Collect and monitor external remote services logs for unauthorized access


Feb 18 2021

Credential stuffing attack hit RIPE NCC: Members have to enable 2FA

Category: 2FA,Access ControlDISC @ 4:03 pm

RIPE NCC announced to have suffered a credential stuffing attack attempting to gain access to single sign-on (SSO) accounts.

The RIPE NCC is a not-for-profit membership association, a Regional Internet Registry and the secretariat for the RIPE community supporting the Internet through technical coordination.

It has over 20,000 members from over 75 countries who act as Local Internet Registries (LIRs) and assign blocks of IP addresses to other organizations in their own country.

The organization mitigated the attack and its investigation confirmed that not SSO accounts have been compromised.

“Last weekend, RIPE NCC Access, our single sign-on (SSO) service was affected by what appears to be a deliberate ‘credential-stuffing’ attack, which caused some downtime,” reads a statement published by the organization.  

“We mitigated the attack, and we are now taking steps to ensure that our services are better protected against such threats in the future. Our preliminary investigations do not indicate that any SSO accounts have been compromised.”


Aug 28 2020

Cisco engineer resigns then nukes 16k WebEx accounts, 456 VMs

Category: Access Control,Information SecurityDISC @ 9:06 am

A former Cisco employee pleaded guilty to accessing the company’s cloud infrastructure in 2018, five months after resigning, to deploy code that led to the shut down of more than 16,000 WebEx Teams accounts and the deletion of 456 virtual machines.

According to a plea agreement filed on July 30, 2020, 30-year-old Sudhish Kasaba Ramesh accessed Cisco’s cloud infrastructure hosted on Amazon Web Services without permission on September 24, 2018 — he resigned from the company in April 2018.

Source: Cisco engineer resigns then nukes 16k WebEx accounts, 456 VMs

From Weakest Link to Human Firewall in Seven Days

Download a Security Risk Assessment Steps paper!

Security Risk assessment Quiz – Find Out How Your security risk assessment Stands Up!

DISC InfoSec 🔒 securing the business 🔒 via latest InfoSec titles

Subscribe to DISC InfoSec blog by Email

👉 Download a Virtual CISO (#vCISO) and Security Advisory Fact Sheet & Cybersecurity Cheat Sheet





Jun 14 2020

Tech firms suspend use of ‘biased’ facial recognition technology

Amazon, IBM and now Microsoft ban the sale of facial recognition technology to police departments and are urging for federal laws to regulate its use.

Source: Tech firms suspend use of ‘biased’ facial recognition technology

Download a Security Risk Assessment steps paper!

Download a vCISO template

Subscribe to DISC InfoSec blog by Email



Why Cities Are Banning Facial Recognition Technology | WIRED
httpv://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sYftT5YgwVI

Facial-recognition technology: safe or scary?
httpv://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-yvxbi5GMnA



ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE Dangers to Humanity: AI, U.S., China, Big Tech, Facial Recogniton, Drones, Smart Phones, IoT, 5G, Robotics, Cybernetics, & Bio-Digital Social Programming





Sep 26 2019

Live and let live InfoSec

User vs Security

secret password
Live and let live InfoSec

The average person’s take on security control: they have real jobs to do, and security isn’t one of them. so remember ‘usability vs bypass security control’ when designing a new control. Please feel free to share your opinion on this.



Funny business meeting illustrating how hard it is for an (infosec) engineer to fit into the corporate world!
httpv://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BKorP55Aqvg

parkour vs security chase
httpv://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Hnv5OOpr4ug


Subscribe to DISC InfoSec blog by Email





Mar 31 2019

Facial ID payment

Category: Access Control,AuthenticationDISC @ 4:50 pm






Aug 23 2018

Secure File Sharing from any device

Category: Access Control,App Security,data securityDISC @ 4:36 pm

Easy Desktop Access to Cloud Files

Ditch Email Attachments. With your files in the cloud, you can easily share them with anyone — even if they’re outside your company firewall — with a simple link via email or straight from Box.

Keep Everybody on the Same Page. Easily share files and folders, and add, move or edit files while always having the latest file version on hand.

Preview Files Without Download. With Box, you can view 120+ types of files, including Word, Excel, PDF, AI, EPS, PSD, photos and more—without downloading a single file.

Easily Share Your Workspace. Right click any folder to share instantly or open on box.com and invite your team to view, edit and upload files, turning folders into collaborative workspaces.

Never Lose Files. A stolen laptop or hard drive crash doesn’t mean you lose your files. Safely store all of your work documents and projects in Box Drive.

 

Box enables secure file sharing and collaboration so you can get real work done with anyone, from any device.

 

  • Secure File Sharing. Easily and securely share files—even sensitive or confidential ones—without worry.
  • Hassle-Free File Sharing. Ditch email attachments! Share any file with a simple link or straight from Box, with anyone you want.



An Introduction to Box: The Modern Content Management Platform

Discover how Box can solve simple and complex challenges, from sharing and accessing files on mobile devices to sophisticated business processes like data governance and retention.






Jul 27 2017

Why You Should Be Using a Password Manager

Category: Access ControlDISC @ 9:50 pm

Password managers such as LastPass offer a simple service: They will store all your annoying passwords (and help you generate new ones if needed) and then give them out to whatever service you’re logging into through the use of browser add-ons and apps. They’re much like the password tools already built into your browser itself—the ones that ask you if you want to save your password for this site so you don’t have it enter it again. Password managers, however, were built for this specific purpose and include a suite of tools that let you access the same library of passwords across your devices. This cache of passwords is, of course, protected by a super-password of its own which you obviously need to choose carefully.

With a password manager, on the other hand, it’s trivial to make all your passwords unique. You don’t need to memorize passwords, because it’s impossible-to-memorize 30-character long password, text, and symbols which are hard to type. When you have to change them, no problem. LastPass even has a feature that will auto-change your passwords for supported sites. In the worst case scenario if passwords are somehow exposed, your most crucial accounts should be protected by two-factor authentication.

While the risks of password managers prevail over by the ease with which LastPass allow you to make your passwords strong and unique, they do have their downsides. LastPass App is available on virtually every device, but you will have to download them on new gadgets before logging in to other things. This also makes logging into your accounts on someone else’s device a strange and potentially risky proposition.

Inevitably, you’ll stumble across a device that isn’t supported, and then you’re spending five minutes typing your incomprehensible Amazon password onto a Kindle manually while looking back at your phone for reference all the while. (It pays to keep a handful of the crucial passwords strong, but still something you can memorize). And for the full suite of features any password manager offers, you’re going to have to shell out a little bit of cash. It’s worth it for the convenience and peace of mind.

PasswordManager.com

Why You Should Be Using A Password Manager


Everybody should install and use a password manager. Without a password manager, you’ll find yourself using simple-minded passwords like LastPass, or memorizing one strong password and using it over and over. Password manager prices range from nothing at all to $40 or more. At $12 per year, LastPass 4.0 Premium is on the low side for a commercial password manager price-wise, but on the high side feature-wise. The current version’s online console has gotten a welcome face-lift, along with a number of useful new features.

BEST PASSWORD MANAGERS OF 2017: REVIEWS OF THE TOP PRODUCTS

“LastPass also supports a range of multi-factor authentication options for protecting your vault, including app-based authenticators like Symantec VIP and Google Authenticator, hardware tokens like YubiKey, and fingerprint readers. And its $12-a-year subscription is a steal when other password manager services charge as much as $35 for a single user.”





Tags: Multi-factor authentication, Password


Jan 14 2014

What to Log for Authentication and Access Control

Category: Access Control,Log ManagementDISC @ 10:30 am

Authentication and access control plays a critical role in web application security.  Mostly for logging, all authentication and access control events should be logged which includes but not limited to successes and failures. If  we are logging only the successful events, someone may brute force attack the passwords without any detection or notice. On the contrary, let’s say only failures are logged, a legitimate or valid user may misuse, corrupt, harm or simply abuse the system without any detection. Besides that all other authentication and access control related events (such as account lockout) are important and must be logged.

  • Failed log in
  • Successful log in
  • Account locked /disable
  • Account unlocked / enabled
  • Account created
  • Password changed
  • Username changed
  • Logged out

Logs should include the resources involved in the web application (IP address, URL, user name, http method, protocol version, etc…) and document the reason why access was denied for the failed event. Some application provides much better logs than others. generally log entries should contain (user ID, timestamp, source IP, Description of the event, error code, priority).

All error conditions should be logged including simple stuff as sql query errors, which can help to detect sql injection attack. Some errors related to the availability of the application are important for early sign to trigger BCP. Availability is one of the main pillar of information security, so it should be logged and monitored. Log error conditions should include but not limited to (failed queries, file not found and cannot open error, unexpected state, connection failure and timeout)

Besides the inherent benefits of log management, a number of laws and regulations further compel organizations to store and review certain logs. The following is a listing of key regulations, standards, and guidelines that help define organizations’ needs for log management – ISO 27001, ISO 22301, FISMA, GLBA, HIPAA, SOX, and PCI-DSS.

Guide to Computer Security Log Management: Recommendations of the National Institute of Standards and Technology: Special Publication 800-92

Security Log Management

 




Tags: Access Control, authentication, Log Analysis, logging, Security, Site Management


Mar 28 2013

Compartmentalizing and Segmenting Privileged Passwords

Category: Access ControlDISC @ 9:34 am

Privileged Password

By Liberman Software @ Identity Week

If you’re a fan of old war movies – and especially if you’re a child of the Cold War – then you no doubt recall watching scenes where prior to launching a nuclear missile, two operators will turn their launch keys simultaneously in order to initiate the launch. The military refers to this security process as “The Two Person Concept” or “The Two Man Rule”. Sometimes the phrase “Double Safekeeping” is used.

The concept is that double safekeeping is an effective control mechanism for ensuring the highest levels of security during critical operations. That’s because the process requires two or more authorized personnel to be involved before sensitive resources or information can be accessed.

So it’s only logical to assume that if double safekeeping can prevent something as crucial as the accidental or malicious launch of nuclear weapons by a single person, then the practice can be extended into other realms of security.

Double Safekeeping and Privileged Account Management

And that’s exactly what my company did recently within the field of privileged account management. Our flagship privileged identity management product, Enterprise Random Password Managerℱ (ERPM), now includes a version of double safekeeping that controls privileged passwords.

ERPM is a security product that automatically discovers, secures, tracks and audits privileged accounts across multiple operating systems. It continuously changes privileged passwords, and helps prevent unauthorized users and programs from being able to access an organization’s most sensitive data.

Now, with its new double safekeeping feature, ERPM can release different password segments to different authorized IT personnel. It breaks up privileged account passwords into different parts, and each part is assigned to an authorized user, in a fully audited manner.

For example, an IT manager may have one segment of the password, and a systems administrator may have the other segment. Together both people have the entire password, and the ability to access the corresponding privileged account. Separately, neither one can use the powerful account to anonymously change configuration settings, extract confidential data or install programs on their own.

And while this may be the first time you’re hearing about such a capability, I’m betting it won’t be the last.  Some regulatory compliance mandates, like BASEL II, are now requiring organizations to store sensitive information – including passwords – in multiple parts so that one person can’t maintain key secrets individually.

This whole thing reminds me of an old saying that goes something like: “If one man can single handedly save the ship, then it stands to reason that the same man can also single handedly sink the ship.” Take precautions.

 




Tags: Password, Password manager, Privileged Identity Management, Two-man rule


Nov 08 2011

Looking for a secure USB stick with hardware encryption

Category: Access Control,data securityDISC @ 10:55 pm

CESG Approved USB Stick
CESG is the UK Government’s National Technical Authority for Information Assurance

Over 1 million SafeSticks are now in use in the NHS helping to keep patient data and other confidential data secure! Buy your SafeStick today!

SafeStick is a secure USB stick with AES 256 bit hardware encryption and is FIPS 197 certified.

SafeStick includes brute force attack lockdown protection. This means should the password to your SafeStick be entered incorrectly a number of times, the SafeStick is disabled or the data on it wiped.

The antivirus and anti-mailware software available for SafeStick (at an extra cost) prevent any nefarious software from spreading on your SafeStick. With one in four virus or mailware attacks now spread by USB sticks, this is an essential control to have in place.

Key Features and Benefits:

  • Uses AES 256 (FIPS 197 certified) hardware encryption to protect your data – this makes it highly unlikely that, should a drive be lost, that anyone would be able to access the data.
  • This stick is the one that was chosen for use by the UK’s National Health Service (NHS). To date over 1 million SafeSticks are now in use in the NHS helping to keep patient data and other confidential data secure!
  • SafeStick is a fully manageable enterprise solution when used in partnership with SafeConsole (available at an extra cost). SafeConsole allows you to kill a stick if it has gone missing. It also enables you to enforce group policies, allowing you to enforce such policies as allowing certain file types to be put on the drive whilst denying others. You can also reset passwords using SafeConsole.

    SafeStick is tough, durable, waterproof, heat resistant, crush proof. It can take anything you can throw at it.

    SafeStick is compatible with Windows 7, Vista, XP, 2000, 2003, 2008, Mac OSX, Linux and Citrix in an ultra small form factor and can be used as a either a standalone or enterprise solution.

    Simply plug in a SafeStick and within minutes you can be up and running. All you need do is set a password and any data placed on the SafeStick is encrypted.

    Order your SafeStick today!!!

    BlockMaster SafeStick 1G Encrypted USB Flash Drive

    BlockMaster SafeStick 2G Encrypted USB Flash Drive

    BlockMaster SafeStick 32G Encrypted USB Flash Drive





    Jun 29 2011

    TSA Is NOT Security It’s A JOKE!

    Category: Access Control,Information SecurityDISC @ 10:10 pm

    “Security measures that just force the bad guys to change tactics and targets are a waste of money,” said Bruce Schneier, “It would be better to put that money into investigations and intelligence.”

    The security boss of Amsterdam’s Schiphol Airport is calling for an end to endless investment in new technology to improve airline security.
    Marijn Ornstein said: “If you look at all the recent terrorist incidents, the bombs were detected because of human intelligence not because of screening … If even a fraction of what is spent on screening was invested in the intelligence services we would take a real step toward making air travel safer and more pleasant.”

    “TSA Is NOT Security It’s A JOKE!” Issac Yeffet
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=s7pICJ0i6Jc

    Don’t touch my Junk





    Dec 29 2008

    Network Access Control and Security

    Category: Access ControlDISC @ 4:24 am

    Wireless Internet Access Global Map

    The purpose of network access control is to protect and safeguard assets attached to network from threats of unauthorized users gaining access to organization’s assets.

    Network Access Control (NAC) authenticate users to make sure they are authorized to login and following the policies and procedures for login before authorized to use organization assets. Some of the threats to assets are insider fraud, identity theft and botnet infestation, where botnet can be utilized as a launching pad for attacks to other organizations.

    Various laws and regulations have been introduced for various industries to protect organization data. Organization can be held liable, if they don’t practice due diligence or have adequate protection for their assets. Before putting the policy in place to protect these assets it might help to know specific threats to environment. Today’s threats come from well organized criminals who take advantage of unprotected assets. These days most of the cyber crimes are international crimes. Even though most of the countries have cyber crimes laws today but the legal system varies from country to country which slows cooperation between countries. Today’s technology is changing fast but the legal system is not changing fast enough to tackle new cyber crimes. We don’t have comprehensive international laws yet which cover cyber crimes to prosecute these criminals; most of cyber crimes are conducted from a country whose law enforcement agency either don’t have time and training to pursue these crimes vigorously or don’t have a jurisdiction in the country where the crime is committed. Sometime law enforcement agencies get help from Interpol to prosecute these individuals, but most of the time law enforcement agencies in various countries are helpless because these criminals are not in their jurisdiction. In some cases these criminals are utilizing state of the art tools to cover their tracks.

    Some Considerations to tackle NAC: adapt ISO 27002 domain 11 sub category 11.4 (NAC) controls as a policy suitable to your organization.

    1. Create a network access control policy: policy on use of network services
    2. User authentication for internal and external connections
    3. Enforce access control policy
    3a. Up-to-date signature file (anti-virus, anti-worm, anti-trojan, anti-adware)
    3b. Up-to date patches
    3c. Equipment identification in network
    3d. Backup access control logs remotely and review regularly
    3e. Multihome firewall installed which segregate networks
    3f. Harden system configuration
    3g. Network connection control
    3h. Network routing control
    4. Assess the posture of your network regularly to redefine policies
    5. Gartner MarketScope for Network Access Control, 2008
    6. The Forrester Waveℱ: Network Access Control, Q3 2008

    “In Forrester’s 73-criteria evaluation of network access control (NAC) vendors, we found that Microsoft, Cisco Systems, Bradford Networks, and Juniper Networks lead the pack because of their strong enforcement and policy. Microsoft’s NAP technology is a relative newcomer, but has become the de facto standard and pushes NAC into its near-ubiquitous Windows Server customer base.”

    Nortel Secure Network Access and Microsoft NAP integration
    httpv://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rqu88yx4FGc

    Reblog this post [with Zemanta]




    Tags: Cisco Systems, Forrester, Gartner, iso 27002, Juniper Networks, jurisdiction, Law, Law enforcement agency, Microsoft, Microsoft Windows, NAC Policy, Network Access Control, Police, Security


    Aug 21 2008

    Access control fraud and countermeasures

    Category: Access ControlDISC @ 1:22 am

    These days access to the internet is a business requirement. Most businesses are selling their products and services on the internet which sometimes requires customers to have access to the critical assets such as applications and databases. The global growth of the internet has increased complexity and potential risks to these assets. In some cases, one potential breach may put the organization’s very existence at risk.  French bank SociĂ©tĂ© GĂ©nĂ©rale made a frightening announcement in Jan. 2008 that it has uncovered a $7.14 billion US fraud â€” one of history’s biggest.  A trader at the futures desk misled investors in 2007 and 2008 through a “scheme of elaborate fictitious transactions.”


    In a security review, the reviewer will first determine the criticality of an asset and focus on how that asset is accessed by employees, the risks that unauthorized access by insiders or outsiders could pose to the organization, and if access control has sufficient countermeasures in place to mitigate those risks.  In other words, the security review will determine the risk level of access control to a particular asset and what appropriate control should be in place based on level of risk. At the same time, the business’s first priority is to make information available with effective access control in place. Based on criticality, assets subject to security review present different level of risk associated with access control. In other words, “not all data breaches are created equal.”


    Authorization control is utilized to determine access to network resources. Authentication will determine the identity of the user. Authentication verifies that the login belongs to a user who is attempting to gain access to the system which can be obtained through PKI, smart cards, USB devices, tokens and biometrics.  Accounting keeps the records of user activity including what was used, when and for how long. Most of the application and operating systems have strong auditing features in place to track the activities of a user. Accounting records can be very useful for forensic evidence in case of a security breach. Authenticity covers validity of the information, if someone misrepresents your information by claiming that it is his or hers. Authenticity addresses all forms of information misrepresentation and authenticity of the system users.


    In system profiling, the reviewer determines the criticality of access control and the risk posed to an organization where the risk is directly proportional to the criticality of an asset. Higher risk will require stronger controls or perhaps multiple controls. Security review should determine that controls in place are sufficient to avoid unauthorized access and non-repudiation of information and people. In many ways a password is the weakest link in the access control of a network defense. The best passwords are at least 60 random characters, letters, numbers, and punctuation which can be stored on a portable flash drive flash drive, to be retrieved when needed. All the passwords for the critical infrastructure should have these password characteristics. One weak password in the critical infrastructure can become a launching pad to access other resources in the network.


    Security tools can be used to collect user permissions in a spreadsheet, which can be utilized to analyze the effectiveness of authentication, authorization, accounting, and authenticity. This analysis will determine if users have appropriate access based on need, role and security policy of the organization. Non-repudiation is the cornerstone of access control which assures the validity of a transaction and user. Regular monitoring and non-repudiation of users in all facets of access control might be necessary to mitigate the identity fraud associated with high profile assets. Compliance only addresses the bare minimum required to comply with a control but to measure the strength of a control in high profile assets, a security reviewer should use due care to regularly evaluate the effectiveness of access control at all levels. It might not be an example of due diligence when some regulations fail to require data encryption.


    Security Threats


    Rogue Trader Crushes Bank Societe Generale


    httpv://www.youtube.com/watch?v=h4qD_ooM198


    (Free Two-Day Shipping from Amazon Prime). Great books




    Tags: accounting, authentication, authenticity, authorization, bast passwords, countermeasure, data encryption, due diligence, fraud, higher risk, identity fraud, mitigate, non-repudiation, potential risks, security review, security tools, societe general, unauthorized access


    « Previous Page