Jul 29 2025

How is AI transforming the hacking landscape, and how can different standards and regulations help mitigate these emerging threats?

Category: AI,Security Risk Assessmentdisc7 @ 1:39 pm

AI is enhancing both offensive and defensive cyber capabilities. Hackers use AI for automated phishing, malware generation, and evading detection. On the other side, defenders use AI for threat detection, behavioral analysis, and faster response. Standards like ISO/IEC 27001, ISO/IEC 42001, NIST AI RMF, and the EU AI Act promote secure AI development, risk-based controls, AI governance and transparency—helping to reduce the misuse of AI in cyberattacks. Regulations enforce accountability, transparency, trustworthiness especially for high-risk systems, and create a framework for safe AI innovation.

Regulations enforce accountability and support safe AI innovation in several key ways:

  1. Defined Risk Categories: Laws like the EU AI Act classify AI systems by risk level (e.g., unacceptable, high, limited, minimal), requiring stricter controls for high-risk applications. This ensures appropriate safeguards are in place based on potential harm.
  2. Mandatory Compliance Requirements: Standards such as ISO/IEC 42001 or NIST AI RMF help organizations implement risk management frameworks, conduct impact assessments, and maintain documentation. Regulators can audit these artifacts to ensure responsible use.
  3. Transparency and Explainability: Many regulations require that AI systems—especially those used in sensitive areas like finance, health, or law—be explainable and auditable, which builds trust and deters misuse.
  4. Human Oversight: Regulations often mandate human-in-the-loop or human-on-the-loop controls to prevent fully autonomous decision-making in critical scenarios, minimizing the risk of AI causing unintended harm.
  5. Accountability for Outcomes: By assigning responsibility to providers, deployers, or users of AI systems, regulations like EU AI Act make it clear who is liable for breaches, misuse, or failures, discouraging reckless or opaque deployments.
  6. Security and Robustness Requirements: Regulations often require AI to be tested against adversarial attacks and ensure resilience against manipulation, helping mitigate risks from malicious actors.
  7. Innovation Sandboxes: Some regulatory frameworks allow for “sandboxes” where AI systems can be tested under regulatory supervision. This encourages innovation while managing risk.

In short, regulations don’t just restrict—they guide safe development, reduce uncertainty, and encourage trust in AI systems, which is essential for long-term innovation.

Yes, for a solid starting point in safe AI development and building trust, I recommend:

  1. ISO/IEC 42001 (Artificial Intelligence Management System)
    • Focuses on establishing a management system specifically for AI, covering risk management, governance, and ethical considerations.
    • Helps organizations integrate AI safety into existing processes.
  2. NIST AI Risk Management Framework (AI RMF)
    • Provides a practical, flexible approach to identifying and managing AI risks throughout the system lifecycle.
    • Emphasizes trustworthiness, transparency, and accountability.
  3. EU Artificial Intelligence Act (Draft Regulation)
    • Sets clear legal requirements for AI systems based on risk levels.
    • Encourages transparency, robustness, and human oversight, especially for high-risk AI applications.

Starting with ISO/IEC 42001 or the NIST AI RMF is great for internal governance and risk management, while the EU AI Act is important if you operate in or with the European market due to its legal enforceability.

Together, these standards and regulations provide a comprehensive foundation to develop AI responsibly, foster trust with users, and enable innovation within safe boundaries.

Securing Generative AI : Protecting Your AI Systems from Emerging Threats

Understanding the EU AI Act: A Risk-Based Framework for Trustworthy AI – Implications for U.S. Organizations

What are the benefits of AI certification Like AICP by EXIN

Think Before You Share: The Hidden Privacy Costs of AI Convenience

The AI Readiness Gap: High Usage, Low Security

Mitigate and adapt with AICM (AI Controls Matrix)

DISC InfoSec’s earlier posts on the AI topic

Secure Your Business. Simplify Compliance. Gain Peace of Mind

InfoSec services | InfoSec books | Follow our blog | DISC llc is listed on The vCISO Directory | ISO 27k Chat bot | Comprehensive vCISO Services | ISMS Services | Security Risk Assessment Services | Mergers and Acquisition Security

Tags: emerging AI threats, hacking landscape