🔐 What the OWASP Top 10 Is and Why It Matters
The OWASP Top 10 remains one of the most widely respected, community-driven lists of critical application security risks. Its purpose is to spotlight where most serious vulnerabilities occur so development teams can prioritize mitigation. The 2025 edition reinforces that many vulnerabilities aren’t just coding mistakes — they stem from design flaws, architectural decisions, dependency weaknesses, and misconfigurations.
🎯 Insecure Design and Misconfiguration Stay Central
Insecure design and weak configurations continue to top the risk landscape, especially as apps become more complex and distributed. Even with AI tools helping write code or templates, if foundational security thinking is missing early, these tools can unintentionally embed insecure patterns at scale.
📦 Third-Party Dependencies Expand Attack Surface
Modern software isn’t just code you write — it’s an ecosystem of open-source libraries, services, infrastructure components, and AI models. The Top 10 now reflects how vulnerable elements in this wider ecosystem frequently introduce weaknesses long before deployment. Without visibility into every component your software relies on, you’re effectively blind to many major risks.
🤖 AI Accelerates Both Innovation and Risk
AI tools — including code generators and helpers — accelerate development but don’t automatically improve security. They can reproduce insecure patterns, suggest outdated APIs, or introduce unvetted components. As a result, traditional OWASP concerns like authentication failures and injection risks can be amplified in AI-augmented workflows.
🧠 Supply Chains Now Include AI Artifacts
The definition of a “component” in application security now includes datasets, pretrained models, plugins, and other AI artifacts. These parts often lack mature governance, standardized versioning, and reliable vulnerability disclosures. This broadening of scope means that software supply chains — especially when AI is involved — demand deeper inspection and continuous monitoring.
🔎 Trust Boundaries and Data Exposure Expand
AI-enabled systems often interact dynamically with internal and external data sources. If trust boundaries aren’t clearly defined or enforced — e.g., through access controls, validation rules, or output filtering — sensitive data can leak or be manipulated. Many traditional vulnerabilities resurface in this context, just with AI-flavored twists.
🛠 Automation Must Be Paired With Guardrails
Automation — whether CI/CD pipelines or AI-assisted code completion — speeds delivery. But without policy-driven controls that enforce security tests and approvals at the same velocity, vulnerabilities can propagate fast and wide. Proactive, automated governance is essential to prevent insecure components from reaching production.
📊 Sonatype’s Focus: Visibility and Policy
Sonatype’s argument in the article is that the foundational practices used to secure traditional application security risks (inventorying dependencies, enforcing policy, continuous visibility) also apply to AI-driven risks. Better visibility into components — including models and datasets — plus enforceable policies helps organizations balance speed and security. (Sonatype)
🧠 My Perspective
The Sonatype article doesn’t reinvent OWASP’s Top 10, but instead bridges the gap between traditional application security and emerging AI-enabled risk vectors. What’s clear from the latest OWASP work and related research is that:
- AI doesn’t create wholly new vulnerabilities; it magnifies existing ones (insecure design, misconfiguration, supply chain gaps) while adding its own nuances like model artefacts, prompt risks, and dynamic data flows.
- Effective security in the AI era still boils down to proactive controls — visibility, validation, governance, and human oversight — but applied across a broader ecosystem that now includes models, datasets, and AI-augmented pipelines.
- Organizations tend to treat AI as a productivity tool, not a risk domain; aligning AI risk management with established frameworks like OWASP helps anchor security in well-tested principles even as threats evolve.
In short: OWASP’s Top 10 remains highly relevant, but teams must think beyond code alone — to components, AI behaviors, and trust boundaries — to secure modern applications effectively.
InfoSec services | InfoSec books | Follow our blog | DISC llc is listed on The vCISO Directory | ISO 27k Chat bot | Comprehensive vCISO Services | ISMS Services | AIMS Services | Security Risk Assessment Services | Mergers and Acquisition Security
At DISC InfoSec, we help organizations navigate this landscape by aligning AI risk management, governance, security, and compliance into a single, practical roadmap. Whether you are experimenting with AI or deploying it at scale, we help you choose and operationalize the right frameworks to reduce risk and build trust. Learn more at DISC InfoSec.
- Integrating ISO 42001 AI Management Systems into Existing ISO 27001 Frameworks
- Cybersecurity in the Age of AI: Why Intelligent, Governed Security Workflows Matter More Than Ever
- 🔐 What the OWASP Top 10 Is and Why It Matters
- AI Is the New Shadow IT: Why Cybersecurity Must Own AI Risk and Governance
- OWASP Top 10 Web Application Security Risks ↔ MITRE ATT&CK Mapping
